Search for: "In Interest of BM" Results 21 - 40 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2019, 7:56 pm by Dennis Crouch
In 2015, Momenta petitioned for inter partes review of US Patent 8,476,239 owned by BMS. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
 It followed, that a breach of such a requirement must attract a sanction distinct from the sanctions applicable for breach of the other substantive BMS conditions. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:11 am by Brett L. Myers
  Presumably the result would have been different if BM Medical had established that Turner actually solicited BM Medical’s clients, or if BM Medical had shown that the information that Turner had was particularly sensitive to BM Medical’s business interests. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:41 am by Jason Rantanen
  These decisions are particularly interesting because they contain pairs of opinions with opposite outcomes. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:39 am by law shucks
(Another interesting tidbit: in July 2008, the firm withdrew from Taipei and Silicon Valley. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"Plaintiff, along with other potential plaintiffs, met with Michael Barasch from BMS&P, and was  informed that BMS&P was prepared to represent him. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 7:49 pm by Ian C. Keefe
Nonetheless, if you are named a person of interest, the police are looking to talk to you. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 4:29 am by David DePaolo
It takes BM to move things and get action in work comp. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 4:29 am by David DePaolo
It takes BM to move things and get action in work comp. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 5:36 pm by Scott McKeown
Bristol-Myers Squibb (“BMS”) holds a patent related to abatacept (Orencia®), a drug for immune system disorders like rheumatoid arthritis. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 7:08 pm by Dennis Crouch
”  Thus, Momenta no longer had the same interest in the appeal. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am by Anubha Sinha
He discussed the interesting aspects of the US decision. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:23 pm by Schachtman
That claim alone should put us on our guard against whose interests are being included and excluded as legitimate “public” interest. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 7:18 pm by Karen T. Willitts, Esq.
The Appellate Division dismissed the Board’s action for child support from AS as to BM given that BM’s father is not AS. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:45 am by Matthew Gregory
The proposals will therefore be of interest to anyone who may be subject to regulation under the BMR. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:40 am
For some companies, there is a buyer out there, somewhere, but for the fact that the identity of that interested party is unknown. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 3:33 am by Anders Valentin (Bugge Valentin)
The explanatory notes elaborate on the purposes of the section which include the interest in a fast and cheap registration of utility models. [read post]