Search for: "In Interest of LJ"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2007, 2:17 am
Interesting climbdown.I guess that one can be chalked up as another, albeit belated, victory for the users in web 2.0 culture - rather as with AACS and Digg.It also makes it fairly plain that LJ's main worry was probably the appearance of locked communities to advertisers (where the visble content is mainly the "interests" - such as rape or paedophilia - rather than serious legal worries. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:10 pm
Good thing LJ didn't catch me with "false advertising" as an overriding interest! [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 11:46 pm
As noted above, the decision is littered with points of interest and, given that it has been rendered by a Lord Justice of Appeal, albeit one sitting at first instance, it will carry significant weight. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:34 am
Normal service looks to have been resumed following the Court of Appeal judgment in IPCom v Vodafone [2021] EWCA Civ 205, in which Arnold LJ reversed a first instance finding by Recorder Douglas Campbell QC that Vodafone was entitled to a defence of Crown use in respect of certain acts which infringed an IPCom patent, as well as providing some interesting commentary on the application of the de minimis infringement defence. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 2:00 pm
(ljs) [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:23 pm
Sir Robin Jacob, who was also sitting on the case, agreed with Lewison LJ's judgment. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 5:45 am
Rather belatedly passing on an interesting case I picked up on my Lawtel update a few days ago about getting an injunction in comparative advertising cases (Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd v Vetplus Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 584 CA (Civ Div) (Pill LJ, Longmore LJ, Jacob LJ) 20/6/2007). [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 2:00 pm
(ljs) [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 2:00 pm
(ljs) [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 12:52 am
And so, this week Arnold LJ handed down his judgment in FibroGen v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:00 pm
(ljs) [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 12:27 pm
Interesting this, but also ripe for painful conflicts of interest between solicitor and client. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 2:40 am
In those cases where Arnold LJ gave the leading judgment, Floyd LJ has always agreed. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:07 am
But what is interesting is the extent to which monitoring of the scheme was regarded as so significant by Sullivan LJ.Anyway, the important thing about Sullivan LJ’s short judgment is that he makes a point about the “common sense” required of the judge in dealing with a challenge to an allocation scheme. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:07 am
But what is interesting is the extent to which monitoring of the scheme was regarded as so significant by Sullivan LJ.Anyway, the important thing about Sullivan LJ’s short judgment is that he makes a point about the “common sense” required of the judge in dealing with a challenge to an allocation scheme. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:01 am
Recent Canadian Articles Some readers of this site may be interested in the... [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 5:48 am
LJ caught up with Goldstein to explore in more detail what the verdict means and what role university libraries might play in implementing the changes. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:29 am
” This is … an interesting reading of the DMCA. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 8:14 am
” “Coulson LJ and Males LJ concluded that the clause dealing with conflicts in SCL’s engagement letter created an ongoing obligation for SCL to avoid conflicts of interest. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:00 pm
[1] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25. [2] Companies Act 2006, section 172. [3] Companies Act 2006, section 172(3). [4] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2019] EWCA Civ 112. [5] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25 [7] (Reed LJ). [6] Companies Act 2006, Part 23. [7] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [8] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [9] (n 4). [10] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25 [10] (Reed LJ).… [read post]
