Search for: "In Interest of LJ"
Results 1 - 20
of 979
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2007, 2:17 am
Interesting climbdown.I guess that one can be chalked up as another, albeit belated, victory for the users in web 2.0 culture - rather as with AACS and Digg.It also makes it fairly plain that LJ's main worry was probably the appearance of locked communities to advertisers (where the visble content is mainly the "interests" - such as rape or paedophilia - rather than serious legal worries. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:10 pm
Good thing LJ didn't catch me with "false advertising" as an overriding interest! [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 2:00 pm
(ljs) [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:23 pm
Sir Robin Jacob, who was also sitting on the case, agreed with Lewison LJ's judgment. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 12:52 am
And so, this week Arnold LJ handed down his judgment in FibroGen v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 2:00 pm
(ljs) [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 2:00 pm
(ljs) [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:00 pm
(ljs) [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:07 am
But what is interesting is the extent to which monitoring of the scheme was regarded as so significant by Sullivan LJ.Anyway, the important thing about Sullivan LJ’s short judgment is that he makes a point about the “common sense” required of the judge in dealing with a challenge to an allocation scheme. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:07 am
But what is interesting is the extent to which monitoring of the scheme was regarded as so significant by Sullivan LJ.Anyway, the important thing about Sullivan LJ’s short judgment is that he makes a point about the “common sense” required of the judge in dealing with a challenge to an allocation scheme. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:01 am
Recent Canadian Articles Some readers of this site may be interested in the... [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 5:48 am
LJ caught up with Goldstein to explore in more detail what the verdict means and what role university libraries might play in implementing the changes. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 8:14 am
” “Coulson LJ and Males LJ concluded that the clause dealing with conflicts in SCL’s engagement letter created an ongoing obligation for SCL to avoid conflicts of interest. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:00 pm
[1] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25. [2] Companies Act 2006, section 172. [3] Companies Act 2006, section 172(3). [4] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2019] EWCA Civ 112. [5] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25 [7] (Reed LJ). [6] Companies Act 2006, Part 23. [7] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [8] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [9] (n 4). [10] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25 [10] (Reed LJ).… [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:29 am
” This is … an interesting reading of the DMCA. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:31 pm
We welcome applications from scholars studying law and jurisprudence whose research interests dovetail with the mission of the DeLaney Center. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:31 pm
We welcome applications from scholars studying law and jurisprudence whose research interests dovetail with the mission of the DeLaney Center. [read post]
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagree on the inventiveness of expandable hoses [2020] EWCA Civ 871
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am
Floyd LJ concluded that the suggestion that McDonald would interest a garden hose skilled person should have been approached "with a high degree of scepticism" (para. 105). [read post]
15 May 2010, 12:39 am
Here are two upcoming lectures of possible interest to legal historians at the John W. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:35 pm
It's difficult, without seeing the judges' ruling, to be completely sure that the information Thomas LJ and Lloyd-Jones J would like to publish relating to the treatment of Binyam Mohamed must be published by a British court: originally disclosure was sought in the interests of Mohamed's defence before an American military commission, but now that prosecution has been halted of course. [read post]
