Search for: "In Matter of Estate of Hillman"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
Bottom line: the beneficiary form is a matter of contract between the policy owner and the insurance company. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
Petitioner Jacqueline Hillman – the widow of deceased federal employee Warren Hillman – argues that it does not; instead, she contends that she is entitled to sue to obtain the proceeds of her husband’s life insurance policy because the state law is at issue simply “regulates domestic relations and family matters” without doing any “major damage to a federal interest. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
Bottom line: the beneficiary form is a matter of contract between the policy owner and the insurance company. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
Homesteads apply to “homes” owned by sole owners, joint tenants, tenants by the entirety, tenant in common, life estate holders, and the holders of beneficial interests in a real estate trust holding title to a residence. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:14 am
The bankruptcy trustee took the position that the home, because it was in a trust, was no longer real estate subject to homestead protection. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:29 am
” Hillman v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
Hillman upheld the validity of MERS serving as “nominee” when he granted a servicer’s motion for relief from stay in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
The Office of Medicaid now appears to take the position that all assets held in any Irrevocable Trust should be counted for MassHealth purposes, despite having regulations to the contrary. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
The Office of Medicaid now appears to take the position that all assets held in any Irrevocable Trust should be counted for MassHealth purposes, despite having regulations to the contrary. [read post]
