Search for: "In Matter of Graham (john C.)*" Results 1 - 20 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2024, 6:31 am
This post is based on an article forthcoming in the Journal of Applied Corporate Finance by John Graham, Professor Grennan, Campbell R. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:31 am
This post is based on an article forthcoming in the Journal of Applied Corporate Finance by John Graham, Professor Grennan, Campbell R. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
Sheriff John McCormick held that the event had been cancelled because of the religious or philosophical beliefs of BGEA and Franklin Graham as viewed by the SEC’s reaction by others to the religious or philosophical beliefs professed by BGEA and/or Franklin Graham. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:57 am by David Bernstein
As an antidote, I recommend reading Thomas C. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 2:35 am by INFORRM
” The result of the exclusions appears to be that the John Lewis customer review section would now be out of scope, but a site such as Mumsnet would still be in scope. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
This is Part 2 of a post dealing with evidence given by government Ministers to two Commons Committees – the Home Affairs Committee and the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee – discussing, among other things, the government’s proposed Online Harms legislation. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 8:23 am by Michael Lumer
John and Jane Does, the Second Circuit next addressed the case of Matthews v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 8:23 am by Michael Lumer
John and Jane Does, the Second Circuit next addressed the case of Matthews v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:01 am by Kali Borkoski
” Crime and Consequences has linked to a video on C-SPAN of a conversation between “ideological rivals” Erwin Chemerinsky and John Eastman. [read post]