Search for: "In Matter of Wright (r. Don)*"
Results 21 - 40
of 243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm
("Great happy hour," Heather R. reports credibly on Yelp.) [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Watson (Georgia), Sonja R. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 5:02 am
"] From Howell-Wright v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 2:42 am
I don’t know. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 8:04 am
The plan of the fund is to invest billions in chip manufacturing R&D and manufacturing capacity. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 8:04 am
The plan of the fund is to invest billions in chip manufacturing R&D and manufacturing capacity. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 9:10 am
No matter our race, color, religion, or creed, we are one America, and we put America first. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
The White House did not consult the Federal Communications Commission on the forthcoming executive order, according to a person briefed on the matter. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 11:03 am
The recent Court of Appeal decision in R. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
Professor Mila Sohoni is the author of a string of significant articles on administrative law, and two of her forthcoming articles are about national injunctions. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:51 am
Facebook has 30,000 people (a mix of employees and contractors, if that matters) working on Safety & Security. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
It is not inherently problematic (constitutionally or legally speaking) for a President to take a firm, even dominant, hand in overseeing, limiting, or, for that matter, terminating federal criminal investigations; if President Trump had terminated any DOJ investigation of Hillary Clinton that was still ongoing when he took office in the name of national healing, no one would think that improper. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Maybe this idea makes sense as a matter of policy in some areas of regulation, but we don’t see much constitutional support for imposing a general ripeness requirement on legislatures. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 12:58 pm
At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel J.Philip Calabrese, Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP, Columbus, for Appellant Huntington Bank Ronald R. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In our democracy, more speech is to be favored over less speech (especially as to controversial matters of public policy), and the proper answer to unwise or hurtful speech is better, counter speech, not silencing (or allowing someone else to silence) the original speaker.As against these concerns of government manipulation/distortion and conferral of a Heckler’s veto, of course, the important government objectives of fiscal integrity and the avoidance of violence must be weighed.The… [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
In my last column, Part One of this series, I examined a lawsuit challenging the Arizona state law scheme for holding a replacement election to fill the US Senate vacancy created by John McCain’s death last year. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
But, again, I don’t [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court has explained, this doctrine “recognizes that only one State should have the authority to regulate a corporation’s internal affairs—matters peculiar to the relationships among or between the corporation and its current officers, directors, and shareholders—because otherwise a corporation could be faced with conflicting demands. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
But the problem with this kind of reasoning is that the rules and systems of manners and politesse don’t derive from or demand analytic coherence and consistency the way rules and systems of constitutional doctrines generally do and should. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
Making matters more complicated, Congress itself, when it initially proposed the amendment, placed a seven-year time limit (until March 22, 1979) on effective ratification. [read post]
