Search for: "In Re: Amendments to the Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms" Results 1 - 20 of 278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2009, 1:24 am
The Florida Supreme Court released the following court rule opinions:Opinions Released Mar. 19, 2009SC08_1612 - In re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile ProcedureSC08_2176 - In re: Approval of Application for Determination of Indigent Status Form For Use By Clerks and Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.984Opinions Released Mar. 5, 2009OP_SC08_1488 - In Re: Standard Jury Instructions In… [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:08 am by admin
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA – IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS, CASE NO. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Today, Canadian families take a wide variety of forms. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The state’s governor, Ned Lamont, in the news this week for signing a bill to make Connecticut the first state to provide incarcerated people with free phone calls, approved this important parentage bill at the end of May.The law represents the best aspect of modern era of family law—the effort to design rules that reflect the wide-range of family forms and which help individual families, regardless of form, create… [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:33 pm by Law Lady
Supreme Court of Florida.Family law forms -- Amendments -- Name change petitions
IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS. [read post]
15 May 2008, 4:07 pm
Click In Re Marriage and you'll see the 172 page opinion from the Supreme Court of California today. [read post]
The court held that it was reasonable for law enforcement to not seek a warrant based on a combination of outdated Supreme Court opinions about obsolete "beeper" tracking technology, the nonbinding decisions of other circuit courts, and the advice of a prosecutor, who has an incentive to approve overly aggressive police investigative practices. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The petitioner was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for killing four members of his family. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Like the Papa Bear in the Berenstain Bear family, the authors show us how not to interpret a statute properly, through examples from federal court decisions. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Respondent on April 12, 1994 filed a motion returnable April 27, 1994 seeking re-argument of the dispositional order dated April 7, 1994. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
We at the Supreme Court mourn the loss of a beloved colleague, a fiercely independent defender of the rule of law, and an eloquent advocate for civics education. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am by Mark Ashton
 The United States Supreme Court ruled that a statute passed by a large majority of both houses of Congress (by 5:1 margins) and approved as law by President Clinton on subjects related directly to the operation of the national government was unconstitutional because it encroached upon the rights of the individual states to regulate matters of family law. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:37 pm by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court has upheld the denial of the right to vote for felons. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am by Patricia Hughes
Supreme Court of Canada JurisprudenceThe Supreme Court of Canada first considered section 3 of the Charter in the 1991 Saskatchewan Electoral Boundaries case. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 12:50 pm
The court ruled ultimately that, yes, DOMA violated the Fifth Amendment rights of these individuals. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am by Carrie Cordero, Quinta Jurecic
” So far, reporting has not revealed whether the Office of Legal Counsel approved the order as to form and legality. [read post]