Search for: "In Re: Application of Chevron"
Results 61 - 80
of 295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
In re Application of the Republic of Ecuador, No. 10-MC-80225 CRB (EMC), 2010 WL 4973492, at *5; In re Letter of Request From Crown Prosecution Serv., 870 F.2d 686, 690 (D.C. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
In re Application of Dr. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Australian legislatures are not frequently having to re-draft legislation in response to court decisions which interpret administrative powers differently from the way they are understood by the executive (though there are some examples). [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 7:20 am
“And here’s the kicker: They’re right. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
In re Application of the Republic of Ecuador, No. 10-MC-80225 CRB (EMC), 2010 WL 4973492, at *5; In re Letter of Request From Crown Prosecution Serv., 870 F.2d 686, 690 (D.C. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 8:03 pm
A spokesperson for the defendant stated in 2014, We’re going to fight this until hell freezes over. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:04 pm
The government told the court of appeals that, if the validity of its rule (re)interpreting the machinegun statute "turns on the applicability of Chevron, it would prefer that the [r]ule be set aside rather than upheld. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:44 am
On the other hand, Justice Alito's absence from this statement is interesting in light of Justice Alito's fervent defense and application of Chevron deference in his solo Pereira dissent. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:22 pm
§ 1.704(c)(8).Note that Chevron and Cuozzo are cited:Under the review provision of the APA applicable here, a court mayset aside the PTO’s actions onlyif they are “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 2:16 pm
[2] In re Henriksen, 399 F.2d 253 (C.C.P.A. 1968) [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 12:05 pm
The court also held that DACA failed the first step in Chevron USA v Natural Res. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 2:20 pm
You should re-read the original post on Best Key to understand what is going on here. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:49 pm
The party asserting waiver gets only the initial communication(s).The case is In re Application of Chevron Corp., No. 10-4699 (3d Cir. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:03 am
Res. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:49 am
***The Fire of Genius blog had written of arguments against the USPTO rules on continuing applications: (2) The regulatory / Patent Office power arguments aren't as silly, but they're close. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:45 pm
In re Checkosky, 23 F.3d 452, 462-63 (D.C.Cir.1993). [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/UKLGwUZy3e -> Chevron Corp v. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 7:16 am
You're to be given deference to interpret the statute as to PTO operations. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 7:38 am
The Court’s conservative super majority wants to reverse its Chevron Doctrine that conditionally supports judicial deference to the expertise resident in agencies such as the Federal Communications Commission. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 7:38 am
The Court’s conservative super majority wants to reverse its Chevron Doctrine that conditionally supports judicial deference to the expertise resident in agencies such as the Federal Communications Commission. [read post]
