Search for: "In Re: Asbestos Prod, et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2018, 7:15 am
CertainTeed Corporation, et al., 2017-0004. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:48 am
See also In re Asbestos Prods. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
Via Howard Bashman, whose client won, comes the Third Circuit's Sullivan et al. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Selikoff perpetuated a good deal of mischief and misinformation to keep his myth that all fiber types are the same (and that “asbestos is asbestos is asbestos”). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Martin, et al., New York Evidence Handbook 318 (2d ed. 2002)). [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
Lanzo’s prior asbestos exposure. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Much of Selikoff’s asbestos work that was original was wrong. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
Riegel et al. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am
Dow Chemical Co., 484 U.S. 1004 (1988); see also In re “Agent Orange” Prod. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:58 am
Dow Chemical Co., 484 U.S. 1004 (1988); see also In re “Agent Orange” Prod. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:58 am
Dow Chemical Co., 484 U.S. 1004 (1988); see also In re “Agent Orange” Prod. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:29 pm
” IARC Monograph for Carbon Black, Titanium Dioxide & Talc, vol 93 (2010); Robert Baan, et al., “Carcinogenicity of carbon black, titanium dioxide, and talc,” 7 Lancet Oncology 295 (2006)5. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Tex. 2007) In re Bextra and Celebrex Marketing Sales Practices and Prod. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:23 am
Minn. 2007) In re Rezulin Prods. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am
Furthermore the studies behind these claims frequently involve exposures to other known or suspected lung carcinogens, such as arsenic, radon, dietary factors, asbestos, and others. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Tex. 2007) In re Bextra and Celebrex Marketing Sales Practices and Prod. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
Asbestos litigation existed as workman’s compensation cases from the 1930s, and as occasional, isolated cases against manufacturers, from the late 1950s.[1] By 1970, federal regulation of asbestos, in both occupational and environmental settings, however, helped create a legal perpetual motion machine that is still running, half a century later. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:13 pm
See also In re Bextra and Celebrex Marketing Sales Practices and Prod. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Supp. 247 (1984), rev’d on other grounds, 816 F.2d 1417 (10th Cir. 1987) In re TMI Litig., 927 F. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
