Search for: "In Re: Fosamax Products Liability Litigation"
Results 41 - 60
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2012, 11:54 am
Feb. 23, 2012) (express warranty); In re Pamidronate Products Liability Litigation, ___ F. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:24 pm
In In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 694 F. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 6:48 am
There’s so many Accutane (Roche) and Fosamax (Merck) cases they’re deemed a mass tort, and there’s a good chance that Propecia (Merck) might end up as one, too. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
Litig., 2000 WL 1222042 (E.D.Pa. 2000) Fosamax In re Fosamax Prods. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:50 am
Contact Lens Solution Products Liability Litigation (no website)MDL-1836 IN RE Mirapex Products Liability Litigation But, some are still going strong and may well continue to generate law that we report on here:MDL-1355 IN RE Propulsid Products Liability Litigation MDL-1507 IN RE Prempro Products Liability Litigation MDL-1789 IN RE Fosamax… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:27 pm
” In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 742 F. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 8:41 am
In In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 2012 U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:02 am
This second Fosamax multidistrict litigation (MDL) case is IN RE: FOSAMAX (ALENDRONATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 11:25 am
Merck faces about 1,000 ONJ product liability suits over Fosamax that involve similar allegations. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm
Stryker Corp., 631 F.3d 777, 782 (5th Cir. 2011); In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 2011 WL 5903623, at *7 (D.N.J. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:49 am
Nov. 22, 2011) (metoclopramide) and In re Fosamax Litigation, 2011 U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:24 am
Dec. 9, 2009)(“a jury must determine whether a reasonable person would attach significance to the off-label use of [the medical device] before deciding whether to undergo the surgery in this case”); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 384 N.J. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm
Ohio Aug. 12, 2011) (same); In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 2009 WL 3398930 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 9:08 am
In re: Fosamax Products Liability Litigation (Secrest v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 2:02 pm
This Secrest case if one of the hundreds of federal court lawsuits that are combined in In Re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, MDL 1789, U.S. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 694 F. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 9:20 am
- A review of the new Dukes and AEP (global warming) Supreme Court decisions for how they might apply to drug/device product liability litigation - Link.June 20, 2011: Phony Choices - New Zicam decision distinguishing prescription drug and toxic tort cases with respect to need for dosage information in Daubert causation opinions - Link.June 17, 2011: E-Discovery Fee Shifting? [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:47 am
In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation (Boles), 2011 U.S. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:15 pm
Essentially the same result occurred in In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 645 F. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:20 am
App. 2003); In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 742 F.Supp.2d 460, 471-72 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (applying Florida law) (all refusing to apply §6(c) in cases involving prescription drugs).It's had somewhat more acceptance in device and vaccine cases where an alternative design requirement at least isn’t physically impossible. [read post]
