Search for: "In Re: Katherine C." Results 41 - 60 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Enforcement lacks transparency re: nature/volume of sanctions. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Katherine Oyama Google: We do agree that the DMCA has allowed an explosion of creativity and economic growth. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Re-Examining Customary International Law and the Federal Courts. [read post]
10 May 2023, 12:35 pm by Sean Harrington
: Answers from Inside the US Justice System / Gaudet, Katherine S., editor.; Beety, Valena Elizabeth. contributor. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:29 am
Nimock.05/28/09 San Diego Union-Tribune, by Glen Lavy, senior vice president and senior counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund05/27/09 Waldlaw Blog, by Deborah Wald (faulting the ruling for undermining state constitution's equal protection clause)05/26/09 CalLaw ("Prop 8 reaction from lawyers and academics")05/26/09 Volokh Conspiracy, by University of Minnesota law professor law professor Dale Carpenter05/26/09 Volokh Conspiracy, by Ilyra Somin, with links to law blog debate on whether… [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:59 am by Hughes Estate Group Attorneys
These are the questions posed by Katherin C. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:10 pm by Laurie Lin
But c’mon — if you’re an attractive Maserati-owning millionaire hedge fund tycoon, you (a) don’t exist, and (b) aren’t going to be seeking female companionship from the ranks of the Department of Justice.3. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 5:24 am by Rob Robinson
Russian officials could re-mobilize last year’s conscripts when their terms expire on October 1. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 2:36 pm by Sophia Cope
This embed will serve content from c-span.org Recognizing the gravity of the challenges presented, Ranking Member Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) aptly stated: “I want to be very clear: I’m not for gutting Section 230. [read post]
1 May 2016, 11:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Platforms have become good at moderation of TOS-violating content; they’re much better than the gov’t, and also unlike the gov’t they’re allowed to do it. [read post]