Search for: "In Re: M., Mark, III" Results 1 - 20 of 403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2007, 9:44 am
After disassembling and re-assembling the guitar, the problem continued. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:45 am by Buce
You're covered if nobody knows except those who are in the club. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
    A PI for FI on LDNRFrank Industries v Nike [2018] EWCA Civ 497 (Court of Appeal) (March 2018) (not on Bailii)I’m told that back in the day, preliminary injunctions in trade mark cases were two a penny. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 3:29 am
October 4, 2016 - 10 A M: In re Forney Industries, Inc., Serial No. 86269096 [Refusal to register the color scheme "yellow into red with a black border near the top" used on packaging for metal hardware, welding equipment, safety goods and marking products, on the ground that the mark is not inherently distinctive and therefore is registrable on the Principal Register only upon proof of acquired distinctiveness]. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
Patterson MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, California, 90013-1024 (213) 892-5200 Mitchell M. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:38 am by Dan Markel
Please mark your calendars for this exciting conference of which  I'm thrilled to be a part. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 A couple of observations: (1) No Notice of Suit Incoming (which is how they display regardless of whether they're about filing or resolution) showed up for the underlying litigation that led to the partial cancellation of the Louboutin mark. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 11:47 am
 Not a fan of them, to be sure, but if they're done well, I'm okay with it. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
So the mark was lost for the goods and services to which those marks were applied – such as restaurant services. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 6:14 am
[pause] how do you feel about mark mcgwire being kept out of the hall of fame? [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 7:13 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cohen, 392 U.S. 83, 95 (1968) (advisory opinions are not within the purview of Article III). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
At least I’ve got this to you before you sit down for your first Christmas lunch (CITMA on 1 December, I’m looking at you). 1. [read post]