Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases" Results 61 - 80 of 543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2010, 11:51 am by Steve Sady
We are practically alone in tolerating this practice – only Louisiana also allows non-unanimous juries in felony cases. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:27 am by Abbe R. Gluck
United States, is a challenge to jury instructions in two prosecutions of doctors accused of operating opioids “pill mills,” and otherwise prescribing outside the bounds of ordinary medical practice. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 3:40 am by Russ Bensing
In the meantime, no rest for the courts of appeals; the 8th District alone handed down 14 decisions in just criminal cases last week. [read post]
Both cases alleged that their respective juries should have been instructed that it had to be shown that the defendants intended to act outside the bounds of their normal professional practice to be found guilty. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:23 am by Elizabeth Kruska
I bring this up only because when you’re dealing with jury instructions, there are specific times to object, and if you don’t do it right, you may not preserve it correctly. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:34 am
I say quasi-jury instructions because I've had feedback suggesting that they are potentially too complicated for most juries. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:28 am
The judge not only told prospective jurors during jury selection, but then again during jury instructions. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:21 am by MBettman
Dowling violates the Double Jeopardy clause because allowing acquittal evidence to be used in a subsequent criminal case forces the accused to re-mount a defense to charges on which he has already been acquitted. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:31 pm by moderator
 Three of the cases are from the Court of Criminal Appeals.State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 5:01 pm by Evan Lee
Therefore, the court reasoned, it wouldn’t have made any difference if his jury had been instructed that they could convict only if they found that Greer knew he was a felon. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 2:10 pm by John Rubin
The Court found that the trial judge’s message was clear and unambiguous, did not relate to guilt or innocence, and did not amount to an instruction to the jury. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:29 am by Robert Loeb, Katie Kopp, Melanie Hallums
They are used to setting the rules and standards—and having others comply. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:34 pm by Richard M. Re
A jury found for the jail officers, but Kingsley argues that the jury decided the case under the wrong legal standard. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 9:34 am by Eugene Volokh
(One way this could happen is that the standard for criminal negligence in criminal cases is generally higher than for civil negligence, though in this case the jury instructions didn't seem to reflect that.) [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]