Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2018-13" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2020, 10:25 am by Shea Denning
” Using this standard, the defendant had more than six times, and up to 13 times, the amount of methamphetamine typically purchased. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:04 pm by Christopher Tyner
  By its terms, G.S. 15A-544.5 clearly and unambiguously instructs that it is the exclusive avenue of relief from a bond forfeiture that has not yet become a final judgment. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
The trial court then brought the jury back into the courtroom, instructed the jurors not to consider Defendant’s absence in weighing the evidence or determining guilt, and allowed the State to continue to present its case. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
”[9] The Reporter’s example of PCBs and small lung cancer was an obvious reference to the Joiner case, in which the Supreme Court held that the trial judge had properly excluded causation opinions. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 10:56 am by Roger Parloff
Except where otherwise indicated, the factual account below is drawn from the findings of the June 2018 inspector general’s report. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
{At the hearing, the court further pressed the State's counsel on what kinds of proof would be necessary to prove a criminal defamation case before a judge (since individuals prosecuted for criminal defamation have no right to a jury). [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm by Andrew Delaney
Since February 2013, when you’re filing any type of medical negligence case, you must—not “should” or “ought to” or “should consider”—must include a certificate of merit. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
”4 The brief is silent about what might be knowing deference, or appropriate publication standards. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 9:17 pm by Chuck Cosson
And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
Petitioner filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Seeking to test the constitutionality of the law, Cruz lent $260,000 to his 2018 re-election campaign. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
Two issues occupied most of the justices’ time at oral argument: whether courts should play a role in partisan-gerrymandering cases at all and, to a lesser extent, if so, what standard should be used to determine whether partisan gerrymandering has occurred. [read post]
11 May 2020, 2:13 pm by Elliot Setzer
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Wednesday, May 13, 2020, at 9:30 a.m.: The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will hold a videoconference on the Cyberspace Solarium Commission report. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
My Charleston article described every reported case we could find involving locational limits on bearing arms. [read post]