Search for: "In Re Anthony F."
Results 21 - 40
of 390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2020, 5:37 am
[I]f you’re here after curfew, we’re not going to have anything to do with you... [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:57 am
” In re Save Venice N.Y., Inc., 259 F.3d 1346, 59 U.S.P.Q.2d 1778, 1783 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 12:38 pm
”); In re Coors Brewing Co., 343 F.3d 1340, 1345 (Fed. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 1:57 pm
John F. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:38 am
Anthony, Inc., 886 F.3d 674 (8th Cir. 2018) the Eighth Circuit adopted rules concerning standing that place common sense limits on the ability of serial plaintiffs to expand their lawsuits any time they are threatened with mootness. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:52 am
This value is very important in civil litigation: hence, limitation periods, res judicata, etc. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:26 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:06 pm
In re Anthony,414 F.2d 1383 (CCPA 1969) (FDA, not USPTO, is responsible for safety ofdrugs which are sought to be patented); In re Watson, 517 F.2d 465 (CCPA1975) (Congress has given responsibility to FDA, not USPTO, to determinein the first instance whether drugs are safe); Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Buhman and British Columbia’s Reference Re: Section 293, (Emory Law Journal, Vol. 64, p. 1815, 2015).Sarah Adams-Schoen, Land Use Law Update: Will Reed v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 3:34 am
In re High Caliper Growing, Inc., Serial No. 86589047 (August 30, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Anthony R. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 5:58 am
[ABA Journal] * Disbarred defense attorney F. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm
PTO rejected an unrelated company (unrelated to Caylee or Casey Anthony) to register CASEY ANTHONY for entertainment services. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:48 am
You have to supply them with a reason for doing what they’re doing. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:57 am
" In re General Mills IP Holdings II, LLC, Serial No. 86757390 (August 22, 2017) [precedential] (Opinon by Judge Anthony R. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 4:04 am
§ 1052(f), provides that the PTO may accept five years of “substantially exclusive and continuous” use as prima facie evidence of acquired distinctiveness, the statute does not require the PTO to do so. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:30 pm
See Anthony’s Pizza & Pasta Int’l Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:57 am
Anthony I. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
" In re Viterra Inc., 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1909-10 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Smith, F. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:45 am
Robert F. [read post]
