Search for: "In Re Appeal No. 101, Term 1976" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2008, 5:20 pm
  (President Carter elevated 59 in his 1976-80 term.) [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 11:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Section 101 CPC provides that no second appeal shall lie except on the grounds mentioned in Section 100 CPC. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:03 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Waiver of Right to Object: The provisions pertaining to waiver of the right to object to any non-compliance has been substantially re-worded in the New Rules. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am by Norman L. Eisen
GA Code § 15-12-101 Special purpose grand juries may compel evidence and subpoena witnesses. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 6:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(...)Tau acknowledged that she knew that FDA decisions could be appealed, but stated that she was not familiar with the process, as she had never had to appeal an FDA decision regarding an ANDA. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm by Norman L. Eisen
Consequently, in the event that a jury demand is made at the last moment in a term when a jury could not be impaneled in time to try the case in that term, the demand is considered applicable instead to the following term. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 5:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Abend's complaint against Hitchcock, Stewart, MCA, and Universal Film Exchanges alleges that the re-release of the motion picture ["Rear Window"] infringes his copyright in the story because petitioners' right to use the story during the renewal term lapsed when Woolrich died before he could register for the renewal term and transfer his renewal rights to them. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 7:40 am by MBettman
Anderson, 109 Ohio St.3d 101, 2006-Ohio-1934, 846 N.E.2d 43 (a Civ.R. 60(B) motion cannot be used as a substitute for an appeal and that the doctrine of res judicata applies to such a motion). [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:28 pm
Welfare Rights Org., 426 U.S. 26, 41-42 (1976)). [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
’ Arguments drawn from such terms for ascertaining patentability could fairly be employed to challenge almost every patent. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am by Wolfgang Demino
HILL, Jr., Appellee and Cross-Appellant.No. 05-13-01634-CV.Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.Opinion Filed January 26, 2016.773*773 On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
  The New York Court of Appeals is fine on the burden of proof in warning cases generally. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:55 am by Matthew Schruers
”  In short, we’re not precisely sure what the Copyright Act regulates, but whatever it is, Aereo’s doing it. [read post]