Search for: "In Re Appeal of General Motors Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2008, 12:00 pm
(Don't tell us that General Motors can appeal after a final judgment is entered. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:28 am
Bloomberg News reports, "Plaintiffs in personal-injury and product-liability lawsuits against Chrysler LLC and General Motors Corp. are pressing members of Congress to ensure that their cases will be heard in court or an alternate form of compensation is found. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
The Motor Vehicle Accident, Death and TextingThis post examines a recent opinion the Supreme Court -Genesee County, New York issued in a civil case: Vega v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 10:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Reactive Surfaces Ltd., LLP v.Toyota Motor Corp., No. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:43 pm by Bob Dennison
Teledyne Continental Motors Inc., No. 1402 EDA 2007, 2009 WL 1929328 (Pa. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
It resulted here, in my view, in losing a motion -- in a high-value case, no less -- that should have been won.Second, more generally, even if you're a super good lawyer, know your respective lane. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:42 pm by Julie Lam
General Motors Corp, No. 143455, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed in part the decision of the WCAC and remanded the case to the Board of Magistrates for the reasons set forth in the WCAC dissenting opinion. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:53 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
General principles of determining arbitrability as articulated by the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals in a recent appellate opinion. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:53 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
General principles of determining arbitrability as articulated by the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals in a recent appellate opinion. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:55 am
The Bottom Line:  The reach of regulatory oversight over bankrupt entities has become blurred in recent years, especially following some of the decisions in Chrysler and General Motors cases that limited the states’ police powers when actions were brought that could benefit private parties. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 1:20 pm by MOTP
Yamaha Motor Corp., USA, 673 S.W.2d 185, 188 (Tex. 1984) (holding that a party on appeal will not be heard to complain of improper evidence offered by the other side "when he, himself, introduced the same evidence"). [read post]