Search for: "In Re Application U-2"
Results 41 - 60
of 815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2013, 9:27 am
Here is the English and Hanyu Pinyin version of the speech.Talk to Chinese Chambers members re migrationI grew up in Singapore, the ninth child in a family of ten. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:57 am
Rev. 1293 (2014). 2. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:39 pm
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(b)(2)–(6). [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:43 am
" Consequently, the Board concluded that MAMA BEAR does not serve as a designation of source for Applicant’s clothing products and is unregistrable under Sections 1, 2, and 45 of the Lanham Act.Read comments and post your comment here. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 12:15 pm
” The Service’s brief further illuminates this point with a footnote explaining that “[u]nder long-standing procedures, administrative action on an application for exemption is ordinarily suspended if the applicant files suit in court. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:27 pm
In this Section 2(d), 2(e)(1) and dilution-based opposition, Opposer Enbridge, Inc. moved for summary judgment on the ground of fraud, claiming that Applicant Excelerate had never used the applied-for mark ENERGY BRIDGE for various services recited in the subject use-based application. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:42 am
In re Murchison, Serial No. 85748810 (March 24, 2014) [not precedential].The Board observed that the Office may prove scandalousness under Section 2(a) by showing that a proposed mark is vulgar. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 8:57 am
”).From footnote 1:Appellant has not separately argued claims 2, 3, and 5-7. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 9:26 am
If the person is seeking admission or re-admission to the industry; and1. the person is subject to an order under Exchange Act Section 15(b)(4)(H)(i), then the person must file an application unless the order imposing a bar on the person is time-limited and the time period is expired. [read post]
Precedential No. 30: TTAB Okays Warranty Services for Applicant's Goods Sold Under Third-Party Marks
26 Jul 2009, 11:00 pm
In re Husqvarna Aktiebolag, 91 USPQ2d 1436 (TTAB 2009) [precedential].The question on appeal, then, was "whether applicant's activities, as set forth in its identification of services, constitute a service for which a service mark registration may be issued. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 10:49 am
II, § 2, cl. 2. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
Id., at ___ (slip op., at 8).Alice Corp. at *7.Step 2. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
See Kalinowski §12.02[2]; Tops Markets, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
" Article 3(2) of the Madrid Protocol, seized upon by the USPTO in articulating its position, concerns international applications forwarded to the IB by an Office of origin. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 4:02 am
Failure-to-Function/Improper Specimens:TTAB Sees Problems with Applicant's Specimen, Affirms Refusal to Register "20/20 IN 2020" for Optometry Advertising Services TTAB Affirms Bifusal of Design Mark for Training Services: Faulty Specimens and Likelihood of Confusion with "KF" Mark Precedential No. 5: Sustaining U. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:06 am
Apfel, 524 U. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 6:13 am
Modifications en vigueur le 6 avril 2022 en matière de santé et de sécurité du travail Le 6 octobre 2021, la Loi modernisant le régime de santé et de sécurité du travail[1] (ci‑après, la « LMRSST ») a reçu la sanction royale. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 3:13 am
Last month, the Higher Regional Court of Berlin confirmed this ruling (5 U 46/21). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
” E.g., In re Klenosky, 75 App. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
” E.g., In re Klenosky, 75 App. [read post]
