Search for: "In Re Application of Andersen" Results 1 - 20 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2007, 9:02 am
QUAGLIA 9:30 AM 30 min Carson City Courtroom - Second Floor En Banc (Full Court ) 47995 IN RE: APPLICATION OF SHIN 11:00 AM 30 min Carson City Courtroom - Second Floor En Banc (Full Court ) 47878 ANDERSEN FAMILY ASSOC. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:29 am
" In re United Trademark Holdings, Inc., Serial No. 86836082 (June 13, 2017) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Bergsman). [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Many, at best, pay lip service to the Arthur Andersen fee factors, or at least some of them. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan, and Karla Ortiz challenge the defendants’ use of images of their artwork, registered with the U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:26 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1983); In re Andersen, 391 F.2d 953, 958 (CCPA 1968)); see also In re Nievelt, 482 F.2d 965, 968 (CCPA 1973) ("Combining the teachings of references does not involve an ability to combine their specific structures. "). [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:00 am
"]In re United Trademark Holdings, Inc., 122 USPQ2d 1796 (TTAB 2017) [TTABlogged here]. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
Applicant also asserted that its mark has co-existed with the Prince of Wales' emblem for 13 years without objection or confusion, but the Board pointed out that absence of objection or confusion is irrelevant, since Section 2(b) is an absolute bar, and confusion plays no part in the analysis.In re Empire Tech. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:30 am by Juan C. AntĂșnez
Proskauer’s attorney time records for November 2008 describe a conversation of November 7 “with Sofia and Michael re: asset protection plan,” followed two days later by a conversation “with Michael Frankel re: asset protection planning. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 8:10 am
L&P Property Management Co., Opposition No. 91151220 [Likelihood of confusion between Applicant's mark HARTEX for carpet underlay, and Opposer's mark HARTEX for pale crepe rubber and natural latex rubber].January 16, 2007 - 10 AM: In re Wieland Dental + Technik GmbH, Serial No. 76514103 [Section 2(d) refusal of REFLEX for veneering material for dental use, in view of the identical registered mark for orthodontic appliances].January 17, 2007 - 10 AM: In re… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:06 pm by Mandelman
  What they view as precedent isn’t applicable to the economic situation we’re facing today. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am by John Elwood
If you’re reading a blog post that is entirely devoted to cases on the Supreme Court’s docket that haven’t even been granted yet, chances are you’re a law nerd. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:13 am
LMS 463).Relieving against suspension from a union for failure to pay dues (Andersen v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  He issued a comparable warning in a similarly unusual ICO Statement issued on December 1lth, 2017, stating: “On this and other points [of this ICO statement] where the application of expertise and judgment is expected, I believe that gatekeepers and others, including securities lawyers, accountants and consultants, need to focus on their responsibilities. [read post]