Search for: "In Re Applied Paging Technologies, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2020, 5:09 am
In a 94-page opinion issued last Thursday, Vice Chancellor Laster denied defendants’ motion to dismiss in In re Dell Technologies Inc. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 10:20 am
We’re talking about electronic bits zinging around the network, and it’s mostly nonsensical to talk about who “possesses” those electronic bits. [read post]
29 Mar 2006, 12:12 am
" Judge Bucher, who wrote the opinion in this case, didn't think so when the Board (reluctantly) reversed a genericness refusal of the mark DIAMOND WHETSTONE for whetstones, in In re Diamond Machining Technology, Inc., Serial No. 76345334 (May 4, 2004) [not citable]. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm
CSC Holdings, Inc, often referred to as the Cablevision case. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 7:12 am
Facebook, Inc., 19-4034-JMY (E.D. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 5:15 am
The court used the standard set forth in In re Pure Resources, Inc. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 3:26 am
In re Fuhu Holdings, Inc., Serial No. 85326591 (April 19, 2013) [not precedential].The Examining Attorney relied on various definitions and website pages in arguing that OPEN SOURCE HARDWARE is merely descriptive of Applicant Fuhu's services because it identifies the computer hardware that applicant uses in rendering its computer services: Applicant’s services involve the sharing or use of hardware-related information because the provision of an interactive web site… [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 10:33 am
The Majority Opinion On appeal, the panel majority affirmed the District Court’s judgment applying the Federal Circuit’s decisions in BMC Resources, Muniauction, and Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 4:06 pm
Their recent complaint [PDF] against Illinois-based Learning Resources, Inc. includes a claim chart [PDF] explaining the alleged infringement, which is a 42-page detailed chart that describes using a computer to order a toy on the defendant’s website. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:29 am
At pages 121-123 of Innovation and Its Discontents (Jaffe and Lerner), there is text:An illustration of the difficulty of proving that an invention is obvious is the 2002 decision, In re Lee, which revolved around a technology at the very heart of the American way of life: the television remote control [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:43 pm
The court’s decision in the case of In re PLX Technologies Inc. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 8:30 am
Viator, Inc., 2019 WL 4727896 (D.N.J. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:30 pm
See In re Naboso Technology, LLC, Serial No. 87236262 (February 27, 2019) [not precedential], where the applicant filed a trademark application for the foreign term NABOSO, a Czech word that translates to barefoot in English. [read post]
29 May 2007, 9:56 am
But somebody has to apply the original inventions of others, so why not two Stanford grad students? [read post]
I DON’T USUALLY REPRODUCE PRESS RELEASES, but this one is right up my alley. It’s from Planetary Re…
24 Apr 2012, 10:38 am
” “The promise of Planetary Resources is to apply commercial innovation to space exploration. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 1:41 pm
Reaching the 1 billion mark in September, the Applied Discovery ® experience in 2006 represents a 49 percent jump over its own rate of processing in 2005 and a 65,186 percent increase over pages it processed in 2001. [read post]
5 May 2012, 11:17 am
” Share this page: [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am
In re Gartside,203 F.3d 1305, 1316 (Fed. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:04 pm
For more details about National Paint & Coatings Assn., Inc., see the Environmental update page. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:37 am
[A]dvances in technology can increase the potential for unreasonable intrusions into personal privacy. [read post]
