Search for: "In Re CANON INC. " Results 1 - 20 of 157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2009, 11:56 pm
"Precision Optical Instruments Laboratory" is the predecessor of Canon Inc. and was founded in Tokyo in 1937 by Takeshi Mitarai, Goro Toshida, Saburo Uchida and Takeo Maeda.Xerox was founded eariler, in 1906 in Rochester, New York as "The Haloid Company," which originally manufactured photographic paper and equipment. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:19 am by John Steele
Brad asked below about the canonical cases for PR. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
”  In re Jackson, 972 F.3d 25 (2d Cir. 2020). [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:10 pm by Maureen Johnston
Marvel Characters, Inc. 13-1178 Issue: (1) Whether a court can constitutionally take copyrights to works originally owned and authored by an independent contractor and hand them to a private party by judicially re-designating them “works for hire;” (2) whether “employer” under the Copyright Act of 1909 can be judicially extended beyond conventional employment to independent contractors, when this contradicts its common law meaning, binding Supreme Court… [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 11:46 pm
"In a re-issue proceeding, the claim was:1. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:11 am by Dale Carpenter
Clayton County (11th Circuit) and Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:39 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(no longer a party) by Bettcher Industries, Inc. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 8:22 am by Stefanie Levine
The '803 patent is currently the subject of two law suits styled Canon, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 8:22 am by Stefanie Levine
The '803 patent is currently the subject of two law suits styled Canon, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 2:06 am by Jami Schultz, Canon U.S.A.
* Data is from a survey commissioned by Canon U.S.A., Inc., and conducted by OnePoll from September 21 to October 13, 2022, with a panel of 2,002 employed Americans, including 1,018 hybrid workers. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 6:05 am by Maxwell Kennerly
(In re Harvard Indus., Inc.), 568 F.3d 444, 451 (3d Cir. 2009) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). [read post]