Search for: "In Re Cases Filed by DIRECTV, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
DirecTV, Inc., -- F.Supp.2d --, 2007 WL 412498 (S.D.N.Y.) [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 9:14 am
" As I discussed in a prior post, Cohen is poorly reasoned, as the California Supreme Court rejected this very line of analysis in In Re Tobacco II Cases. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:14 am
DirecTV, Inc. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 2:58 am
DIRECTV, Inc., No. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:26 pm
Charter Communications, Inc. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:02 am
Id.Download PDF file of In re DirecTV, Inc., Early Cancellation Fee Marketing & Sales Prac. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 2:31 pm
DirecTV, Inc., --- F.3d ---, 2010 WL 2803093, No. 09-14107 (11th Cir. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 4:01 am
DIRECTV, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Cal.App. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
DirecTV, Inc., 178 Cal.App.4th 966 (2009) (rev. den. 02/10/10) Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:43 pm
DIRECTV, Inc., --- F.3 ---, 2010 WL 2803093 (11th Cir. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:43 pm
DIRECTV, Inc., --- F.3 ---, 2010 WL 2803093 (11th Cir. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:38 pm
(In re Alert Hldgs., Inc.), 148 B.R. 194 (Bankr. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:12 pm
UPDATED to include Tiffany Ebay False Advertising Decision The case is Case 1:04-cv-04607-RJS, Tiffany (NJ), Inc. v. eBay, Inc. . [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
DirecTV, Inc., severely restricting CAFA removal jurisdiction to cases where the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 with respect to at least one class member, but later reverses itself in an October 15 opinion. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 2:51 am
"We're going to have a lot more flexibility in the type of cases we can handle. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:58 pm
Spectralytics filed suit in July of 2005 against Cordis for patent infringement, and in August of 2006 Spectralytics added Norman Noble, Inc. as a defendant. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 5:58 am
We conclude that the district court did not err by construing Nailor's Rule 60(b) motion as an attempt to file a second or successive § 2255 motion, and we DENY Nailor authorization to file a second or successive § 2255 motion because Nailor has not met the applicable statutory requirements. 07a0201p.06 2007/05/31 Directv Inc v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:07 am
Id.See In re Directv, 2011 U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-11-30: Google Scholar link to AUTHORS GUILD, INC. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
DirecTV Group, Inc., 523 F.3d 1323, 1334-35 (Fed. [read post]
