Search for: "In Re Complaint of American Commercial Lines, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
  Plaintiff commenced this personal injury action against the New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA), the vehicle's titled owner and lessor, the vehicle's driver, and the vehicle's registered owner, American Transit, Inc. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Time, Inc., involving a quack exposed by Life magazine; reporters surreptitiously recorded what was going on. [read post]
7 May 2020, 9:05 pm by Lynn McDonough
Congress “wants to keep directing resources to front-line facilities. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
 Elsewhere, the Court of Justice of the European Union has defined, re-defined and refined its own and (perhaps) our understanding of what the right of 'communication to the public' under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive actually is. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am by smtaber
  If you would like to receive this update in an e-mail delivered to your inbox every Monday, please send an e-mail to subscribe@taberlaw.com with the word “subscribe” in the subject line. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Landfill gas collected by the separate Middlesex County Utilities Authority (MCUA) and Edgeboro Disposal Inc. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Nevertheless, although outcomes were not statistically different for Latin American and non-Latin American respondents, amounts claimed against Latin American states were higher - but only for non-ICSID arbitration. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am by David Post
American Booksellers Ass'n, Inc., 484 U.S. 383 (1988) The Humanitarian Law Project had standing to challenge a federal law that criminalized "knowingly provid[ing] material support to a foreign terrorist organization" because it had provided funds to groups designated as terrorist organizations prior to the law's enactment, and it stated its intention to keep doing so. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]