Search for: "In Re Connecticut Asbestos Litigation" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm by admin
(These diagnosing physicians went on to make fortunes by serving as expert witnesses in subsequent civil litigation.) [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 10:11 am by admin
Ignorantia facti is not an excuse for someone who argues for a radical re-ordering of an already fragile litigation system. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 10:11 am by Schachtman
Ignorantia facti is not an excuse for someone who argues for a radical re-ordering of an already fragile litigation system. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  The Second Circuit held – in the context of asbestos mass tort litigation – that a company with “continuous and systematic” business in a state (Connecticut) can’t be sued by out-of-state litigation tourist plaintiffs over out-of-state asbestos exposure. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  According to a Supreme Court case we read (which we didn’t bother to verify), those states are:  Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and Washington. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
  In the intervening period, litigation tourist plaintiffs in mass torts from asbestos to Zyprexa have been casting about for something, anything, to keep non-resident defendants bogged down in the hellholes with litigation against equally non-resident plaintiffs.One gambit we’ve seen from plaintiffs seeking to hold onto jurisdiction over non-resident corporations is to try to take a hitherto uncommon (outside of contractual forum selection clauses) form of… [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
March 2, 2012) (applying Connecticut law); In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011 WL 379327, at *1 (Del. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 Examples are not driving a riding lawnmower parallel to a slope (because you’ll tip over) or only handling asbestos while using a respirator (because breathing asbestos can do nasty things to you). [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  In re Darvocet, Darvon & Propoxyphene Products Liability Litigation, 2012 WL 3842045, at *7-8 (E.D. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
  These include Connecticut, Georgia, Kentucky, and most recently Texas. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:56 pm by Bexis
  In In re Aredia & Zometa Products Liability Litigation, 2012 WL 2015791 (M.D. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am by Joe Consumer
Connecticut filings declined by 30 percent, New York filings by 1 percent, Oregon filings by 42 percent, and Rhode Island filings by 34 percent. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am by Joe Consumer
Connecticut filings declined by 30 percent, New York filings by 1 percent, Oregon filings by 42 percent, and Rhode Island filings by 34 percent. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm by Bexis
Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd., 1986 WL 69060, at *6 (N.D. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:32 pm by Chris Martin
  We’ve only recently had our highest state court ruled that allocation is permitted in long-tail cases, like those involving asbestos and pollution. [read post]