Search for: "In Re Dow Corning Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2024, 10:00 pm
Mich. 2014) (finding that releases did not meet requirement of Dow Corning factor 6 because of lack of opt-out) and In re K3D Prop. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm
In the silicone gel breast implant litigation, plaintiffs’ counsel loved to wave around early Dow Corning experiments with silicone as an insecticide. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 1:43 pm
Now, with the vast bulk of the litigation long settled, key defendants in bankruptcy, and many of plaintiff’s claims resoundingly debunked, all that remains are isolated opt-outs, like In re Dow Corning, Corp., Ezra v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
We're warning you, if you're not a lawyer, then you'll find this post very boring. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 127 N.J. 428, 605 A.2d 1092 (1992) In re Joint E. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
In In re Dow Corning Corp., 250 B.R. 298, 362-63 (Bankr. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:05 am
Dow Corning Corp., 33 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir.1994) (tried in 1991), and in the infamous case of Johnson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
I-Flow Corp., 2011 WL 1361562, at *2, 3-4 (D. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Oct. 24, 1996) Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Dow Corning Corp., 2002 WL 983346, at *2-3 (Conn. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 127 N.J. 428, 605 A.2d 1092 (1992) In re Joint E. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 10:02 pm
Agrium, Inc., 683 F.3d 845, 859–60 (7th Cir. 2012) (en banc); In re High Fructose Corn Syrup Litig., 295 F.3d 651, 657 (7th Cir. 2002); Jack Walters & Sons Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 6:42 am
Troy Corp. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:54 pm
Dow Corning Corp., 884 F. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3] Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Dow Corning Corp., 651 N.Y.S.2d 104 (N.Y. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
Pennsylvania Eng’g Corp., 102 F.3d 194, 198 (5th Cir. 1996)… . [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
Dow AgroSciences, LLC, 705 F. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
We have to admit that we’re scratching out heads about a recent decision out of Alabama that – contrary to everything else we’ve seen – concluded that the manufacturer of a branded drug could be liable in a case where it never sold the generic product that was all the plaintiff every took and thereby (allegedly) suffered injury.It’s not like this issue hasn’t been litigated before in Alabama.The first Alabama case we know of to consider the issue was… [read post]
