Search for: "In Re Dow Corning Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2013, 9:24 am
Caffrey (In re Dow Corning Corp.) [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm
In the silicone gel breast implant litigation, plaintiffs’ counsel loved to wave around early Dow Corning experiments with silicone as an insecticide. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 1:43 pm
Now, with the vast bulk of the litigation long settled, key defendants in bankruptcy, and many of plaintiff’s claims resoundingly debunked, all that remains are isolated opt-outs, like In re Dow Corning, Corp., Ezra v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 10:41 am
In re Dow Corning Corp., 244 B.R. 696, 701-703 (Bankr E.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
We're warning you, if you're not a lawyer, then you'll find this post very boring. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 127 N.J. 428, 605 A.2d 1092 (1992) In re Joint E. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
In In re Dow Corning Corp., 250 B.R. 298, 362-63 (Bankr. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:05 am
Dow Corning Corp., 33 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir.1994) (tried in 1991), and in the infamous case of Johnson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
I-Flow Corp., 2011 WL 1361562, at *2, 3-4 (D. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Oct. 24, 1996) Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Dow Corning Corp., 2002 WL 983346, at *2-3 (Conn. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 127 N.J. 428, 605 A.2d 1092 (1992) In re Joint E. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 10:02 pm
Agrium, Inc., 683 F.3d 845, 859–60 (7th Cir. 2012) (en banc); In re High Fructose Corn Syrup Litig., 295 F.3d 651, 657 (7th Cir. 2002); Jack Walters & Sons Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 6:42 am
Troy Corp. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:54 pm
Dow Corning Corp., 884 F. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3] Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Dow Corning Corp., 651 N.Y.S.2d 104 (N.Y. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
Pennsylvania Eng’g Corp., 102 F.3d 194, 198 (5th Cir. 1996)… . [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
Dow AgroSciences, LLC, 705 F. [read post]
