Search for: "In Re Farrell"
Results 61 - 80
of 308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2009, 2:14 pm
" Thus, a claim in biotechnology can sometimes be obvious if it would be "obvious to try," noting that language to the contrary in the Deuel case is no longer good law.Instead, the Federal Circuit quoted its 1988 decision in In re O'Farrell, stating:It is true that this court and its predecessors have repeatedly emphasized that "obvious to try" is not the standard under § 103. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 4:45 am
The new criminal charges expand on a previous case filed back in December 2014 against Ryan Andrew Gustafson, a man who went by the online monikers "Jack Farrel" and "Willy Clock"—he is also named as one of the four defendants. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 1:40 am
We're happy to report that the amount of content flowing from the LexBlogosphere today is great, the vast majority of it extremely high quality copy. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 3:58 am
Farrell's request for information under Rule 2.61. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 5:44 am
Blog post by Meg Kribble, Research Librarian & Outreach Coordinator; Ed Moloy, Curator of Modern Manuscripts and Archives; and Jessica Farrell, Curator of Digital Collections. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:10 pm
Normally, I try to avoid featuring posts with authors discussing their own clients, as they're usually pretty self-promotional in nature, but today I decided to make an exception as Juan Antunez and Michael Kahn each have excellent posts on their high-profile clients. [read post]
20 May 2008, 11:51 am
The decision to include them wasn't based on the location of their authors, but rather because each author provides a unique take on the issue they're covering...be it the NYSID, public corruption or LLC membership. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 7:13 am
We’re very fortunate. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:23 pm
Farrell was not there. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:26 am
Farrell Indianapolis, Indiana Charity: Girls Rock! [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:09 am
Farrell, 57 AD3d 721 (2d Dept. 2008). [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 8:32 am
Words are powerful and we’re so used to having this unconscious bias.... [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:08 pm
This approach is consistent with our methodology in In re O'Farrell, 853 F.2d 894 (Fed. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:39 am
Cir. 2009) (quoting In re O’Farrell, 853F.2d 894, 903 (Fed. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 11:02 pm
Cir. 2009) (citing In re O'Farrell, 853 F.2d 894, 903-04 (Fed. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:50 am
Thanks again to Kenan Farrell for sharing his advice on the benefits for lawyers within social media. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:49 am
Nothing makes a blogging lawyer smile like a comment to show that folks are engaging with the material they're churning on a near-daily basis... [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 5:30 pm
If you’re struggling, and you need a little help—and I know this is prevalent in the law—just know that it’s there if you ask for it. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:01 pm
For those of you who aren't already signed up, let this be a reminder that tomorrow is our webinar with Cordell Parvin on Client Development 101 for 2011 and Beyond, which we're really looking forward to. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 12:44 am
In re Kellogg North America Co., Serial No. 76610903 (February 22, 2007) [not precedential].The Board applied its standard Section 2(e)(4) analysis in finding that Examining Attorney Anne Farrell established a prima facie case that Applicant Kellogg failed to rebut. [read post]
