Search for: "In Re GI Holdings, Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 74
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
Companies in turn are developing counter­stra­te­gies to defeat evasion techniques. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 3:24 am
April 26, 2022 - 2 PM: In re Aubrac Holdings, LLC , Serial No. 88586817 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of the proposed mark ULTIMATE AMMUNITION for, inter alia, ammunition, and rejection of applicant's Section 2(f) claim of acquired distinctiveness.] [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 12:04 pm by William Ford, Tia Sewell
Gi-Wook Shin, director of the Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research center at Stanford, will moderate the discussion. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If Burstein is right [she is], then they’re no longer applying utility patent standard, which is what they wanted from design right. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
Do you think London cabs have such a distinctive character enough to hold a trade mark? [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
Unfortunately, it also included the latter organisation’s trade mark.* Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicityViacom subsidiary TV Land has just decided to pull the plug on a current re-run on US screens following the tragic Charleston church massacre. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
Now, Darren sinks his paws on the appeal decision in Hospira (UK) Ltd v Genentech, Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 57 (6 February 2015). [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
Last week was another busy one at the IPKat, so it may not be surprising if some missed a post or two. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
 ******************************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 29 [week ending Sunday 11 January] -- Martin Luther King’s movie ‘Selma’ and copyright problems | CJEU’s copyright decisions awaited in 2015 | The Modern Law of Patents reviewed | China becoming a ‘protector’ of patent rights | ‘Je suis charlie’ trade mark in France and OHIM| UK IPO logo’s licensing system | High Court for England and… [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
  These questions, among other things, find a response in High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division's ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another [2015] EWHC 17 (Ch), which Katfriend Aaron Wood (Swindell & Pearson Ltd) kindly reports. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
In re Bird Brain (TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability: Are PARK LANE and PARK AVENUE confusingly similar for footwear? [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:00 pm
Genetics Institute (GI) sued Novartis under 35 U.S.C. [read post]