Search for: "In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Subpoenas for Documents, Appellant"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2017, 2:31 pm
The court begins by explaining that[t]his appeal presents an unusual question of appellate jurisdiction: May we continue to exercise jurisdiction over an appeal of an evidentiary ruling in a grand jury proceeding even after the grand jury has returned both an indictment and a superseding indictment? [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:10 am
Guided by that august adage, we hold that a subpoena duces tecum compelling the production of documents to a now-defunct grand jury cannot be enforced by civil contempt sanctions before a successor grand jury, and we accordingly vacate the district court’s order holding the appellant in civil contempt. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:19 am
On rehearing, a unanimous panel changes course in In re Grand Jury Matter #3, No. 15-2475 (Jan. 27, 2017), holding in this “out-of-lane” case that appellate jurisdiction survived the return of an indictment against a target-turned-defendant challenging a document's presentation to the grand jury. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:13 am
In the first case, the Government appealed an adverse ruling on a grand jury subpoena. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Case no. 11-12268 (11th Cir. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am
§ 192), referring violations to the attorney general, “whose duty it shall be to bring the matter before the grand jury for its action” (2 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The most notable is In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 438 F.3d 1141 (D.C. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
GA Code § 15-12-101 Special purpose grand juries may compel evidence and subpoena witnesses. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
All that said, the constitutional analysis may turn on whether a trial is already complete, and in the stages of post-conviction appellate litigation, which imposes less of a burden on a sitting president. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
The Eleventh Circuit in In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena (U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
The committee served Mazars with a subpoena for 10 years of Trump’s financial documents on April 15, and Trump sued on April 22. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
If the communication is made to the attorney in her capacity as a business adviser, for example, it ought not be privileged”); In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 599 F.2d 504, 511 (2d Cir. 1979) (“Participation of the general counsel does not automatically cloak the investigation with legal garb”). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
The U.S. itself takes exactly the same position with respect to grand jury subpoenas compelling production of records stored abroad, and (as discussed below) with respect to the SCA provisions compelling production of email data stored abroad. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), to the Scooter Libby/Judith Miller case, are quite hostile to the idea of a privilege in the face of a grand jury subpoena, and as I noted in my response to Chris Bray’s thoughtful post, the policy of the common law is hostile to such a privilege: For more than three centuries it has now been recognized as a fundamental maxim that the public (in the words sanctioned by Lord Hardwicke) has a right to every man’s evidence. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
Complaint A complaint is a formal charging document that initiates a criminal action against a person. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 4:19 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated May 9, 1990, 741 F. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:07 pm
Shall prosecute all criminal matters in the name of the Omaha Tribe of Nebraska, making independent decisions on whether to file formal charges, the nature of those charges, whether to recommend plea bargains and trying both jury and non-jury cases. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Dickerson, No. 06-2471 "Conviction and life sentence for drug and weapons offenses are affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) the specific drug quantities found in the current and previous convictions cannot be utilized for sentencing since the trial judge did not expressly instruct the jury that its findings of drug quantities had to be beyond a reasonable doubt; 2) there was error in the sentencing proceedings concerning defendant's prior convictions because… [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
But they’re wrong for very different reasons. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In a jury-research project we once conducted, a very nice older lady at one point threw up her hands and said: “I just want to know if he did it. [read post]
