Search for: "In Re I. Appel Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 1,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 12:01 pm
Dopson) we're talking about a seasoned trial lawyer who knew full well what she was doing.You may perhaps get away with it, as she does here. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 11:57 am
At the same time, the contrary argument raised by the (losing) appellant here shouldn't be sanctioned.The only thing I'd add to Justice McIntyre's analysis is this. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 3:14 pm
In refusing to recognize the core operations inference, the court stated that "the Fifth and Ninth Circuits have rejected it," and cited the In re Read-Rite Corp. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Symantec Corp., 318 F.3d 1363, 1369–71 (Fed. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
Last but not least, as one astute judge noted many years ago in Matter of Pappas, “[i]n the real world, particularly that in which close corporations operate, clear evidence of share ownership is often not found in the corporate books and records, for any number of reasons. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
(Mycogen Corp. v Monsanto Co. (2002) 28 Cal.4th 888, 896-897, fn. 7.) [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 6:31 pm
In-house attys/corps should consider solos/small firms in these times. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:55 am by Dennis Crouch
I would argue that decision was clearly wrong for convenient venue purposes. [read post]