Search for: "In Re INTEL CORPORATION "
Results 1 - 20
of 203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2009, 6:18 am
" We're not sure who the lawyers were who handled the settlment talks. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
By Brett Van Benthysen In re Intel Corp. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 8:21 am
The case is In re Intel Corp. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:29 pm
Here's the letter that dozens of publicly traded companies like Gap, McDonalds, the Mayo Clinic, Intel, General Mills, Saks, Sprint-Nextel, Time Warner and others signed on to, by way of the Association of Corporate Counsels. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 7:08 pm
Sewall does not use the word troll, but he could have: Shell corporations have been established all over the country to take advantage of this loophole, with patents being assigned to such corporations simply for the purpose of filing a suit. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 10:56 am
In 2017 VLSI Technology LLC sued Intel Corporation for patent infringement in the Northern District of California, asserting four patents: U.S. [read post]
4 May 2009, 12:20 am
Former Intel honcho Andy Grove, now 72, but still sucking corporate teat, had a very public senior moment over patents: "Patents themselves have become products. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 8:29 am
We’re terrified. [read post]
24 May 2019, 10:56 am
On page 104, she also addressed this problem of Qualcomm using non-standard-essential patents such as EP'461 against Intel-powered Apple devices in order to bring Apple back into the Qualcomm fold:"Once Apple started purchasing modem chips from Intel, Apple challenged Qualcomm’s royalty rates, as Tony Blevins (Apple Vice President of Procurement) testified at trial: 'There are court proceedings where we’re trying to establish what is a FRAND rate… [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 4:32 am
And, as Cary Klafter, Intel's Corporate Secretary told the Society at its annual conference, most of the internet questions - any many of the live ones too - were about products, and had nothing at all to do with "governance" matters ... although not every company can count on this, of course. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:46 am
In a post at Ars Technica titled Original “patent troll” may call it quits, says there’s no money in it ,Joe Mullin states:Niro's business was infuriating to corporations like Intel, whose patent problems were being tended to by its associate general counsel, Peter Detkin. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 10:18 am
See In re United States, 669 F.3d 1333, 1336 (Fed. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 11:24 pm
" But lately, they're thinking about it a lot more often. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 11:12 am
The question presented in this case is "[w]hether the Federal Circuit erred by holding, in conflict with decisions of this Court and other courts of appeals, that respondent's patent rights were not exhausted by its license agreement with Intel Corporation, and Intel's subsequent sale of products under the license to petitioners. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:45 am
., Google, Adobe Systems, and Intel Corporation are seeking final approval of $415 million agreement to settle all individual and class claims, according to a motion for final approval of class action settlement filed in the federal district court in San Jose, California (In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, June 15, 2015). [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 8:44 pm
Companies such as Corrections Corporation of America are pushing heavily on lawmakers to take tough stances on the matter. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:50 pm
I’ve been critical of recent applications of Section 5 such as Intel and N-Data. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 11:02 am
immigrants in Los Angeles may be pleasantly surprised to know that there are a number of successful Fortune 500 corporations, including Google, Intel and eBay, that were all founded by immigrants. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:09 am
The evi-dence also shows that the suppliers of the accused components are located in California—Qualcomm Incorporatedis based in San Diego and Intel Corporation is based inSanta Clara. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:37 am
Though PTO documents do not disclose the identity of the Requester, it might be Health Discovery Corporation which is now attempting to provoke an interference with the Intel patent. [read post]
