Search for: "In Re Interest of Campbell"
Results 21 - 40
of 604
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
He was never arrested, no charges were ever brought, and there was no countervailing public interest in identifying him. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
When Prince died in 2016, Condé Nast contacted AWF for permission to re-publish the 1984 illustration in a special issue devoted to Prince. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:33 pm
One problem is that First Amendment interests may warrant heightened protection even for source identifiers when they’re attached to expressive works. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am
ChatGPT gave the best list Campbell v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
Several organisations, including the International Press Institute and Reporters Without Borders, have condemned the costs order for its “chilling effect” on free speech and public interest journalism. [read post]
23 May 2023, 9:42 am
While we’re disappointed that the Supreme Court did not take this opportunity to further strengthen fair use law, we hope courts applying Warhol in new cases will heed the Court’s caveats about its narrow application and recognize that its main takeaway is the continued force of Campbell and Google. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The International Press Institute has described the costs order as a “dark day for press freedom” and Reporters Without Borders have criticised it as setting a “chilling precedent for public interest journalism. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:00 am
According to Savanna, the valuations during this earnings season have been interesting. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:20 am
While the current state of the law may not be ideal, there’s nothing to be gained from simply ignoring it and wasting time and money on an appeal you’re likely to lose anyway. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
” “You’re not being good for human relations. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Instead of focusing on damages, we’re focusing only on suspensions and giving both carrots and sticks [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:28 am
The outcome itself was stipulated by the parties, deferring most of the interesting questions about the CCB to future rulings. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
As Justice Souter wrote for a unanimous Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm
“We’re talking about half a trillion dollars and 43 million Americans,” Roberts observed. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Procedural History of the Criminal Investigation and the Perry Litigation Perry has been of interest to Justice Department prosecutors since at least June 2022 for his involvement in efforts to overturn the 2020 election. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
If not, the court may have to address several other interesting, rarely-litigated issues concerning the proper scope of copyright in recorded interviews. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm
Lunney: points out that Campbell was just a remand. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am
Denying injunctive relief may support the public interest, TD Bank v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
As Professor Jud Campbell has written, almost everyone at the Founding (and before) thought “rights were not a set of determinate legal privileges or immunities that the government could not abridge. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 1:05 am
” Among those assets were all of the copyrights and publishing interests held by Campbell and Luke Records in the 2 Live Crew sound recordings and compositions. [read post]
