Search for: "In Re LG ELECTRONICS INC. " Results 1 - 20 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2013, 9:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In a re-exam of an LG Electronics patent [ 7,430,873 ], LG secured a reversal of the examiner's rejections.From within the decision:The most that can be said of Fisher’s disclosure that platform 58 maybe installed in various places in the freezer compartment is that it is notinconsistent with removability. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 12:35 pm by Alex Gasser
On February 4, 2011, LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea (“LG”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 4:21 pm
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:34 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The outcome LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics USA, Inc. seek interlocutory review of a decision of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying LG certain relief with respect to the liability portion of this case. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 11:12 am
LG Electronics Inc., 06-937, where LG Electronics accused Quanta Computer Inc of Taiwan and others of infringing patents on microprocessor chips in its personal computers. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 5:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
InternationalTrade Commission (“ITC” or “Commission”) terminatingan investigation with respect to LG Electronics, Inc., LGElectronics USA, Inc., and LG Electronics MobilecommUSA, Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 1:13 pm by Justinian Lane
Source: LG Electronics dehumidifiers recalled - UPI.com I can't tell if we're dealing with a design defect or a manufacturing defect. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 2:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
LG Electronics Inc. appeals from the United States Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s final written decisions in a pair of inter partes review proceedings challenging claims 5 and 21 of U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 4:04 am
In re LG Electronics Inc., Serial No. 88055289 (August 26, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin).Trademark Rule 2.41(a) provides that an applicant’s “ownership of one or more active prior registrations on the Principal Register . . . of the same mark may be accepted as prima facie evidence of distinctiveness if the goods or services are sufficiently similar to the goods and services in the application. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 7:10 pm by Mark Zamora
From the CPSC:LG Electronics Tianjin Appliance Co., in cooperation with the U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 11:00 pm
 This often comes up in the context of recycling of parts or the on-sale of components.Patent exhaustion is big news at the moment in the US because argument was heard yesterday in the highly important Quanta Computer, Inc. v LG Electronics. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:59 am by Karen E. Keller
(patent infringement) 12/2: In re: Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation (patent infringement) 12/2: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:55 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The investigation is based on a February 4, 2011 complaint filed by LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea alleging violation of Section 337 in the importation into the U.S. and sale of certain digital televisions and components thereof, and certain electronic devices having a Blu-Ray disc player and components thereof that infringe U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 2:55 am
In re LG Electronics, Inc., Serial No. 86472855 (September 13, 2015) [not precedential] (Opinion by Cindy B. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:55 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of New Jersey as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 2:30 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The PTO’s restriction requirement here did notclearly demarcate the actual differences among the species of inventions, as was done in LG Electronics and Acco Brands. [read post]