Search for: "In Re Linn"
Results 1 - 20
of 164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2016, 12:45 pm
The Debtors cases are jointly administered under the lead bankruptcy case In re Linn Energy, LLC, et al., Case No. 16-60040. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Judge Linn further discussed the Supreme Court's decision to deny petition for certiorari in In re Seagate Technology, L.L.C. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:30 pm
Now we're back to the West Linn case, since the parties have filed their final briefs, and the Court is scheduled to decide whether to take the case at its upcoming November 10, 2011 conference. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 1:03 pm
Jack Getman (Texas) wrote a guest post yesterday over at PrawfsBlawg on The Continuing Mischief of the Linn Case. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:55 pm
Noonan -- The Federal Circuit heard oral argument for In re Kubin last week, and a very hot bench (Judge Rader presiding, joined by Judges Linn and Friedman) sharply challenged the positions of both Kubin and the Patent Office. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:11 am
By Jason Rantanen In Re Yasuhito Tanaka (Fed. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:04 pm
By Jason Rantanen In re Verizon Business Network Services Inc. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:35 pm
It is easy to overlook the extraordinary beauty of Alabama when you're living there every day. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
By Donald Zuhn -- This morning, the Federal Circuit issued decisions in both In re Kubin and Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 10:31 am
In Re Petrus A.C.M. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 11:28 pm
They're tricky. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:25 pm
Transitory inventions are patentable according to both In re Breslow and In re Hruby. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 8:56 pm
We’re finally seeing the temperatures drop back down here in Seattle. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:15 am
Judge Linn authored... [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 8:48 am
Down in West Linn, they're gearing up for the dreaded "infill," led by some know-it-all thirty-year-old true believers from the Church of Urban Planning. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:15 am
Judge Linn authored both. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 7:40 am
Within the decision:Similarly, in In re Swartz, 232 F.3d 862, 864 (Fed.Cir. 2000) (“Swartz I”), this court held that the claims ofSwartz’s U.S. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:00 pm
The judge noted that the test often results in re-characterization of the claims and leads to his rhetorical questions as to which claim limitations matter, and which do not, and which claim limitations should be considered and which should be ignored? [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:38 am
In re Klein, ___ F.3d ___ (Fed. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 6:34 am
And, it was common practice back then, and I think you’re justifying the practice, that the examiners very frequently would say ‘Well the claim is rejected A in view of B and C — with respect to the last element, that’s a matter of mere design choice of no patentable consequence. [read post]
