Search for: "In Re M. & M. Mfg. Co."
Results 41 - 50
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) Conference Board of Canada ‘cut and paste’ caper; CBC recalls three reports (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (Copyfight) J D Salinger sues over unauthorised sequel to ‘Catcher in the Rye’ (Excess… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) Conference Board of Canada ‘cut and paste’ caper; CBC recalls three reports (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (Copyfight) J D Salinger sues over unauthorised sequel to ‘Catcher in the Rye’ (Excess… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Take Payday Lenders and Arbitration as a Textbook Case: What is the Majority Position on Litigation Waiver and Who Got It Right? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2018)Last year I taught a course on Corporate Social Responsibility Law for the very first time (Corporate Social Responsibility Law--A Tentative Syllabus). [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
" Hoarel Sign Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
Prodigy Services Co., a 1999 case in which the New York high court held that e-mail systems were immune from liability for allegedly defamatory material sent by their users.[11] E-mail systems aren't common carriers, but the court nonetheless reasoned that they shouldn't be held responsible for failing to block messages, even if they had the legal authority to block them: An e-mail system's "role in transmitting e-mail is akin to that of a telephone company," the… [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
But sometimes they’re deadly. [read post]
