Search for: "In Re MEDTRONIC, INC. "
Results 1 - 20
of 421
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2017, 12:00 am
In In re Medtronic Inc., Shareholder Litigation., 2016 WL 6066253 (Minn. 2017), the Supreme Court of Minnesota affirmed in part, and reversed in part Kenneth Steiner’s (“Respondent”) claims asserted in a class-action challenge to Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 11:14 am
The following is excerpted from a September 13, 2010 article at MassDevice: A federal appeals court handed Medtronic Inc. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 9:02 pm
Medtronic, Inc., No. 06-CV-4078, slip op. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 2:42 am
In Re: Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:36 am
Medtronic, Inc., No. 09-11941, slip op. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 12:35 pm
Medtronic, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-01870-GMN-CWH, slip op. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 3:44 pm
All six cases involved the Sprint Fidelis 6949, manufactured by Medtronic Inc., a leading medical-device maker. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:55 am
In October, this blog published a post discussing the potential interplay between the preemption rules of In re: Medtronic, Inc., and the forthcoming DePuy hip implant litigation. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 10:57 pm
Per Medtronic Navigation, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:41 am
RE39,897 (“RE’897 Patent”). [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 9:23 pm
Patent No. 8,361,156 in an inter partes review instituted on a petition by Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:32 am
In re Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 7:23 am
In re Medtronic, Inc., Implantable Defibrillators Litigation, 2006 WL 3420285 (D. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:28 am
Medtronic, Inc., No. 08-CV-6062, slip op. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 12:26 pm
Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:16 pm
Medtronic Inc. (676 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2012)) left plaintiffs who sue the manufacturers of pre-market approved devices precious little in the way of potential state-law claims that are not expressly preempted by Riegel or impliedly preempted by Buckman. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:01 am
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., 567 F.3d 1314, 1327 (Fed. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:47 am
(proper but inconvenient forum); 22-107 In re: Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:59 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 2010 WL 4026802 (8th Cir. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 5:55 am
District Court Judge Richard Kyle, who was overseeing the federal court Sprint Fidelis MDL -- In Re Medtronic Inc. [read post]
