Search for: "In Re Marriage of Castle" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Natalie Nanasi
The vision of marriage shifted again in the 1960s to so-called “expressive marriage,” in which marriage had to make room for personal fulfillment of each spouse and satisfy their individual desires. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Virginia (1967), in which the Supreme Court held that bans on interracial marriage were unconstitutional, was an occasion to note the importance of the Court’s recognition of marriage as a fundamental right but also the persistence of strong cultural norms against interracial romantic relationships.Roe is unlikely to reach its 50th anniversary intact. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The other provisions relating to surrogacy are not unique to Connecticut but provide clarity to parties contemplating a surrogacy arrangement and predictability about its enforceability.Parentage PresumptionsWith the legalization of same-sex marriage, many courts have struggled with how to apply paternity presumptions in a gender-neutral manner. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This change is the culmination of decades of advocacy to overturn a criminal ban enacted in the wake of the In re Baby M (1988), the first case to consider the legality of surrogacy arrangements. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
We do not assume that men are changed by marriage, nor that the kind of men who get married are different in kind from those who don’t. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Those bases include marriage to a child’s mother and evidence of genetic parentage—neither of which is applicable to K.L. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 10:24 am by admin
Trigger Warning: Political Rant “Let them call me rebel and welcome, I feel no concern from it; but I should suffer the misery of devils, were I to make a whore of my soul by swearing allegiance to one whose character is that of a sottish, stupid, stubborn, worthless, brutish man. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 10:24 am by Schachtman
Trigger Warning: Political Rant “Let them call me rebel and welcome, I feel no concern from it; but I should suffer the misery of devils, were I to make a whore of my soul by swearing allegiance to one whose character is that of a sottish, stupid, stubborn, worthless, brutish man. [read post]
His “covita” moment was brilliantly parodied in an ad by The Lincoln Project, a PAC formed by current and former Republicans dedicated to ensuring Donald Trump is not re-elected.The White House defended this reckless act that flouted any sound medical advice—since Trump was still contagious and put people around him at risk—by explaining that he needed to project “strength” as a world leader. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Grant Hayden
But they’re not identical, and the jurisprudence, despite Judge Ho’s contention, is not at all the same.Judge Ho notes that “Three circuits to date have construed Title VII to prohibit sexual orientation discrimination or transgender discrimination. [read post]