Search for: "In Re Marriage of Nelson"
Results 81 - 94
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm
Jane Schacter is the William Nelson Cromwell professor of law at Stanford Law School. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
Nelson v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm
Abstract: This paper explores the responses to Judge Sonia Sotomayor as symptomatic of new or inferential racism and sexism, which appears to include people of color and challenges systems of power, but in actuality serves to re-center whiteness and maleness. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
As Lyle reported earlier this week, four new same-sex-marriage cases – one for each of the four states composing the Sixth Circuit, each resulting from that court’s recent rejection of constitutional challenges to state same-sex marriage bans – were relisted on Monday: Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
"And whether you're browsing for books, listening to your favorite author read from his or her work, or attending one of the fascinating panels made up of literati of every stripe, Brooklyn is the place to be for booklovers from around the world. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
In re Fidler ,(Bkrtcy.D.Nev.) [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:08 am
With that in mind we arrived at a tentative answer: yes--but that "yes" requires a re conception of democratic practice in ways alien to liberal democracies that center notions of "representation" and "election" in the construction of their own democratic universe. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
For example, if the other eight Justices are all in agreement, she might rethink (and re-rethink) her dissenting vote. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
Nelson v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of The Burger Court & the Rise of the Judicial Right (Simon & Schuster, 2016, pp. 450), by Michael J. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Joiner had can cause small-cell lung cancer.[13] Perhaps the most egregious lapses in scholarship occur when Ranges, a newly minted scientist, and her co-author, a full professor of law, write: “For example, Bendectin, an antinausea medication prescribed to pregnant women, caused a slew of birth defects (hence its nickname ‘The Second Thalidomide’).49”[14] I had to re-read this sentence many times to make sure I was not hallucinating. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
In my post yesterday, I suggested that the case might possibly turn on a rather narrow, fact-dependent question--namely, whether the City has discriminated against CSS on the basis of its religious opposition to same-sex marriage. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
")Tom Paxton - "One Million Lawyers" ("In ten years we're gonna have one million lawyers / How much can a poor nation stand? [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Arguably, we’re so immersed in them that we know more about US law, especially relating to civil rights, than we do about Canadian rights. [read post]
