Search for: "In Re McClung"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2012, 8:33 am
Ex Parte McClung is a case wherein the provisional application did NOT give support to the nonprovisional claims as filed. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm
(See McClung v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 5:25 am
McClung. [read post]
29 May 2022, 1:02 am
In Mr E McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd & Ors [2022] UKET 4110538/2019, Mr McClung was engaged by Doosan Babcock as a self-employed contractor via his own limited company, McClung Strategy and Projects Ltd, which was paid via the second respondent, NRL Ltd [2]. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 2:52 pm
We're left holding the entire bag. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 3:09 am
McClung are close to unteachable to contemporary students who have no historical appreciation for the Civil Rights Movement and the absolute necessity of upholding the CRA. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:24 am
McClung, 379 U.S 294 (1964) in which the court used the commerce clause to outlaw segregated restaurants) and was used to force private businesses to abide by the 1964 Civil Rights Bill (See, Heart of Atlanta Motel v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: : Chapter 11 : Murray Metallurgical Coal : Case No. 20-10390 Holdings, LLC, et al., : : Judge Hoffman : Debtors [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
We're happy to share. [read post]
ND Ga - Bankruptcy Trustee's Claims Against Officers And Directors Subject to Statute Of Limitations
30 Oct 2007, 8:53 am
McClung Survering, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
(Will Baude) Yesterday I posted the amicus brief that I and a group of constitutional law scholars filed in the Court’s recess appointments case, Noel Canning. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 2:22 am
We're filling these treatment facilities as fast as we can build them," said Sen. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 12:28 am
We're filling these treatment facilities as fast as we can build them," said Sen. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 12:40 am
Mr E McClung v Doosan Babcock Ltd and others [2022] UKET 4110538/2019: Should support for a football club (in this case Rangers FC) be regarded as a “philosophical belief” protected by the Equality Act 2010 for the purposes of employment law? [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm
There is no argument by the Crown that the Chambers Judge mischaracterized the question as to the first element of the tri-partite test because it had sought an interim injunction in the context of a “hybrid” application, with the interim application for injunctive relief sounding in civil law. [27] With respect, it is not open to this Court to re-cast the argument in a fashion that the applicant Crown failed to do. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 11:58 am
They're wrong too, but less egregiously so. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Pix credit here The majority’s choice of a different path leaves the remaining Justices with a choice of how to respond. [read post]
