Search for: "In Re Meridia Products Liability Litigation"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2008, 12:00 pm
Jude Medical, Inc., Silzone Heart Valves Products Liability LitigationMDL-1401 IN RE Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc., Hip Prosthesis and Knee Prosthesis Products Liability LitigationMDL-1407 IN RE Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability LitigationMDL-1431 IN RE Baycol Products Liability LitigationMDL-1477 IN RE Serzone Products Liability LitigationMDL-1481 IN RE… [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:40 pm
”In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation, 1997 WL 80527 (E.D. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:12 am
Conn. 2012); In re Meridia Products Liability Litigation, 328 F. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
In re Heparin Product Liability Litigation, 2011 WL 1059660, at *9 (N.D. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 7:09 pm
Kiker slip op. at 13-15, quoting from In re Meridia Prods. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
In short, we're thinking about "preemption lite. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
It ensures harmonious operation of state product liability law with the "unique system used to distribute prescription [products]. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm
See In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation, 514 F.3d 825, 830 (8th Cir. 2008); Thom v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:52 am
May 2, 2007) (ADEs "reflect[] nothing more than an assessment of a possible relationship, not an actual relationship"); In re Meridia Products Liability Litigation, 328 F. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
That may be due to strict liability being a less rigorous theory of liability than medical negligence (although our side tries every day trying not to let that happen), or it may be that there's simply more money in product liability - usually due to malpractice damage caps. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
See Meridia Products Liability Litigation v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
In scientific publishing, when scientists make a mistake, they publish an erratum or a corrigendum. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
Nov. 13, 2006); In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation, 133 F. [read post]
