Search for: "In Re Mm" Results 161 - 180 of 431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2021, 5:22 pm by Russell Knight
“(1) The amount of the alternate payee’s benefit shall be the result of (A/B) x C x D where: “A” equals the number of months of (check only one) regular regular plus permissive other service that the member accumulated in the Retirement System from the date of marriage (enter date MM/DD/YYYY) to the date of divorce (enter date MM/DD/YYYY). [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 7:18 pm by Brian Huddleston
This is another point glossed over amidst the many vague allusions to how MMS is chock-a-block full of Bush-era oil industry crony holdovers. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:09 am
 1, 2006); In re Intel Microprocessor Antitrust Litig., 452 F. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:32 pm by Michael Markarian
MM: How did you continue your campaign after that first ordinance passed? [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:32 pm by Michael Markarian
MM: How did you continue your campaign after that first ordinance passed? [read post]
7 May 2021, 10:37 am by Site Admin
You know, or interesting and nodding, mm hmm, mm hmm, and then it will play these and it makes it, strings it together to make it look like you’re actually in the video when you’re using whatever Charmin makes for a living, which I guess probably why they created that Zoom bot. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 10:49 am by Ross
They’re now talking about the new software – updated to take advantage of the higher resolution display. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:48 pm by Michael Markarian
  MM: What were the chimps like when they first arrived at the sanctuary? [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 4:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
" ]See prior IPBiz post IN RE ROBERT SKVORECZ: confusion over comprising? [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 1:48 pm
The social outings detailed in the report included alcohol-, cocaine- and marijuana-filled parties where certain employees of the Minerals Management Service were nicknamed the "MMS Chicks" by the energy employees. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:08 am by Greg Jacobs
After reporting this information – and in the absence of any action by MMS or any other federal agency – the relators took it upon themselves to file a qui tam action against Shell. [read post]