Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Justices." Results 141 - 160 of 14,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Peter J. Sluka
  But who can forget former Justice Scheinkman’s decision In re Piekos (discussed here), which [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 8:09 am by Russell Knight
” In re Estate of Rennick, 692 NE 2d 1150 – Ill: Supreme Court 1998 “A judicial admission can be either documentary or testimonial. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:53 pm by Béligh Elbalti
Salma Triki, “La compétence internationale tunisienne et le critère de nationalité” in Ben Achour/Triki (eds.), Le Code de droit international privé – Vingt ans d’application (1998-2018) (Latrach edition, 2020) 119ff). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Re-Assessing the Purposes of Early Twenty-First Century Learning and Law Schools (2022). 47. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:32 pm by Ronald Mann
” So if the justices were to decide for themselves whether the sweepstakes rules superseded the user agreement, I can imagine a division of opinion. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm by Ronald Mann
So one possibility is that there will be a scattering of opinions with three or more different views. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 1:55 pm
So maybe Justice Yegan thinks -- entirely accurately -- that this opinion will be read (or quoted) more than the run-of-the-mill appellate opinion, so wants to add some spice.It's not my cup of tea, honestly. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:54 am by Christopher Walsh
The Appellate Division also found that exercising jurisdiction over the defendant would “not offend traditional principles of fair play or substantial justice. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:54 am by Julie Jacobs
The Appellate Division also found that exercising jurisdiction over the defendant would “not offend traditional principles of fair play or substantial justice. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:54 am by Julie Jacobs
The Appellate Division also found that exercising jurisdiction over the defendant would “not offend traditional principles of fair play or substantial justice. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am by Guest Author
 Professor Merrill wondered if Justice Stevens wrote the Chevron two-step test after drafting the rest of the opinion. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Bush) by saying Congress had to re-enact a formula determining which states had to pre-clear election law changes. [read post]
” Because the state statute altering the selection process for the board members was valid on its face—Disney conceded that absent a retaliatory motive the state could adopt the change in governance structure that it did—Disney could not prevail on a claim that the legislature had enacted the statute to retaliate against Disney for its speech.In support of this “settled law,” Judge Windsor invoked a 2015 case from the Eleventh Circuit (in which the district court sits),… [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, just last June, the Court held (in an opinion Justice Alito joined) that the First Amendment shields persons who own expressive businesses and oppose same-sex marriage from public accommodations laws. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:15 pm
Justice Sotomayor, for example, often asks lawyers how they want the Supreme Court to write the case opinion, and sometimes the lawyers' answer to that changes the outcome of a case, Justice Barrett said. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am by SHG
First, that I’m not on the Supreme Court and don’t get a vote, no matter how well I think of my own opinions. [read post]