Search for: "In Re Pacer Technology"
Results 61 - 80
of 126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2017, 7:51 am
See how other leading attorneys have approached the same issue you’re tackling right now—within seconds. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:55 am
William Blair appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 5:45 am
“We’re thrilled to be presenting again this year at Legalweek. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
The lesson: If you have computer problems, you'd better login to PACER and monitor your federal cases. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:45 am
Users can easily set alerts to track companies they’re interested in or follow competing law firms. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
In re Grand Jury Subpoena (Boucher), 2009 U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 9:28 am
Stiverson said AALL's role in the FDLP made the PACER pilot project possible, and because of it we are now better positioned to eventually gain free access to PACER - "I think we'll get it," she said. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
App. 2006); In re Bush (Pa. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 6:47 am
“We’re building strength on strength, and together we’re going to drive the next generation of legal analytics,” said Sander. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:58 pm
And I know we’re going to talk some of the stuff that you’re doing as well. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 7:30 pm
Unique for the industry, Docket Alarm’s API gives other firms and companies the ability to leverage its existing database of PACER cases, alerting capabilities, and analysis in bulk. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:45 am
The Docket Alarm API gives firms and companies the ability to leverage a giant database of PACER cases, alerting capabilities, and analysis in bulk. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:14 am
Users can easily set alerts to track companies they’re interested in or follow competing law firms. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 5:44 am
Greg Lambert: Well, this week, 20 leaders of legal technology, businesses and organizations, were signatories to a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi advising her on what it would mean to the industry and for the country as a whole to drop the paywall to Pacer. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:08 am
When it comes to the federal system, whatever limitations PACER has, there’s still a singular system that you can work with. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:57 pm
Here’s the suppression-hearing transcript, which I have obtained from PACER. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm
And so I really like to think of us as a far more innovative version of Pacer, but with a state trial court system with some really, really fantastic analytics service on top of that data, and law firm intelligence being our newest analytics service on top of this data. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
The only changes from the version published in the subcommittee’s agenda book were: (1) a new sentence in Note for Rule 26(b)(1) encouraging computer search technology (that is to say, predictive coding), and (2) modifying the Note for Rule 37(e) concerning the role of prejudice in subsection (e)(2). [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:10 am
Among them are ideas for adding oral argument audio, case briefs, and data from PACER. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 7:12 am
With regard to patent data solution providers specifically, there are a number of tools that re-code/re-index data from the various global patent offices. [read post]
