Search for: "In Re Peacock" Results 1 - 20 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2018, 5:20 am by SHG
It’s hard to admit you’re wrong. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:48 am by Jack Bogdanski
They're supposed to have been knocked out by now. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 3:50 am by tracey
In re Peacock (Secretary of State for the Home Dept intervening): [2012] UKSC 5;  [2012] WLR (D)  42 “Where a compensation order had been made against a convicted drug trafficker under the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 (which applied where the relevant conviction was before 24 March 2003) to recover an amount equal to his benefit from that criminal activity, but the actual amount of the order was for a lesser sum as being his only realisable assets at the… [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
If you have a no-animals policy, you probably don’t have to create an exception — although, you could depending on the job, work environment, and other related circumstances If you’re inclined to entertain this accommodation request, you’ll want to satisfy yourself that the peacock is trained and won’t disrupt the workplace. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:42 pm by e.koltonski
Among its many business segments are the ISP Xfinity and the online streaming service Peacock. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:39 am by sally
Supreme Court Peacock, Re [2012] UKSC 3 (22 February 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Gul, R v [2012] EWCA Crim 280 (22 February 2012) Dowds v R [2012] EWCA Crim 281 (22 February 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Munin Navigation Company Ltd v Petrodel Resources Ltd ‘Munin Explorer’ [2012] EWCA Civ 136 (21 February 2012) The Mayor Commonalty and Citizens of London v Samede (St Paul’s Churchyard camp representative) & Ors (Rev 1) [2012] EWCA… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 2:47 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On appeal from: [2010] EWCA Civ 1465 The appellant had previously been convicted of drugs offences and was subject to a confiscation order. [read post]
9 May 2016, 8:44 am by Larry Tolchinsky
Peacock Point – Innocent Misrepresentation in a Florida Land Deal Results in Major Lawsuit and Seller Wins _______________ Do you have questions or comments? [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 11:36 am by Jack Bogdanski
The mighty Peacocks of my alma mater, St. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
This is a curiously arbitrary list which now needs re-visiting in light of the judgment in R v Peacock. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 6:42 am
 Martha knows the Marvin Gaye anthem to sexuality pairs horribly with predation, but it's the video she has of the proud Blue Boy, who is no more.Imagine the coyote: "We’re all sensitive people with so much to give/Understand me, sugar... [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:58 pm by Elie Mystal
What does a peacock have in common with a gun owner? [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:01 am by Jennifer Campbell Goddard
While your law firm may not need an audio logo (although we’re sure that more than a few of you would like that!) [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 9:26 am
“My judges here in Okaloosa County are loving it, they’re all over it,” Peacock said.Well, as they say on Broadway, How does it play with the Oklaoosa judiciary? [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:37 am by nothoney
C’mon out and support a great place where they’re doing great work for animals! [read post]