Search for: "In Re Propulsid Products Liability Litigation" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2006, 8:30 am
On the other hand, in In re Propulsid Prods. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:30 am
See In re Propulsid Products Liability Litigation, 208 F.R.D. 133, 141-42 (E.D. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:50 am by Michelle Yeary
Contact Lens Solution Products Liability Litigation (no website)MDL-1836 IN RE Mirapex Products Liability Litigation But, some are still going strong and may well continue to generate law that we report on here:MDL-1355 IN RE Propulsid Products Liability Litigation MDL-1507 IN RE Prempro Products Liability Litigation MDL-1789 IN RE Fosamax… [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
Kan. 1996).In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation, 168 F.R.D. 577 (E.D. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 12:00 pm
L-Tryptophan Products Liability LitigationMDL-986 IN RE "Factor VIII or IX Concentrate Blood Products" Products Liability LitigationMDL-1014 IN RE Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability LitigationMDL-1203 IN RE Diet Drugs (Phentermine/Fenfluramine/Dexfenfluramine) Products Liability LitigationMDL-1348 IN RE Rezulin Products Liability LitigationMDL-1355… [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 10:00 pm
Wash. 2002); In re Propulsid Products Liability Litigation, 208 F.R.D. 133 (E.D. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Personal injury case.In re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation, 2007 WL 3334339 (E.D. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Likewise, in In re Propulsid Products Liability Litigation, 2003 WL 367739 (E.D. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Consumer fraud claims of patients using Propulsid who suffered no physical injury and did not allege paying for the drug alleged insufficient injury.In re Propulsid Products Liability Litigation, 208 F.R.D. 133 (E.D. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
It ensures harmonious operation of state product liability law with the "unique system used to distribute prescription [products]. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:28 am by Beck, et al.
June 27, 2003) (recall); In re Propulsid Products Liability Litigation, 2003 WL 1090235, at *2 (E.D. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Naturally, we’re most interested in the recall cases involving prescription medical products. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Naturally, we’re most interested in the recall cases involving prescription medical products. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Naturally, we’re most interested in the recall cases involving prescription medical products. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Dauphin Co. 1999).Naturally, we're most interested in the recall cases involving prescription medical products. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P­­­_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]