Search for: "In Re Rebecca B."
Results 81 - 100
of 306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2014, 7:29 am
Editor Michael B. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:30 am
Editor Michael B. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:08 am
B. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
B. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:21 am
In re C&D Brewing Ventures, Inc., Serial No. 88935220 (March 26, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Wendy B. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:08 pm
And here’s a slightly amended re-post of this list: Intlawgrrls Title IX Blog Millennial Law Prof Out of the Jungle LibraryLaw Blog clinicians with not enough to do hunter of justice Beyond (Straight and Gay) Marriage First Amendment Law Prof Blog Reproductive Rights Prof Blog Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log Legal Writing Prof Blog Doing Justice Susan Crawford blog Nancy Rapoport's Blogspot HealthLawProf Blog Media Law Prof Blog Law and Magic Blog Banking… [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:15 am
"In re FCA US LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1214 (TTAB 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Anthony R. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 1:47 pm
However, we’re starting to hit a tipping point where the sidewalk closures are becoming a problem. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Lemley: don’t assume we’re moving in the right direction. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:07 am
At oral arguments, Judge Albright, sitting by designation, hit on this point: “by putting ‘it’s patented’ on it, you’re telling the world this is novel, but you’re lying. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm
They do their own screening of IP rights, and are generally cautious b/c they’re academic institutions. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:30 am
So, DEF CON, Blackhat, and B-Sides Las Vegas. [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:38 pm
Know b/c I’ve been creating for 15 years. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
They’re constantly trading off options to shape future rents. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
Introduction: Rebecca TushnetApologies for not doing a great job answering these questions directly; I found myself thinking about the analogical project rather than diving into the details. [read post]
20 May 2016, 12:25 pm
RT: same move is made in In re Tam: §2(a) disparagement is subject to strict scrutiny b/c it’s not commercial speech, but the deception bars in §2 are totally ok because Central Hudson. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:48 am
Smith opposes the motion.IIUnder Rule 12(b)(6), the court evaluates the pleadings by "accept[ing] `all wellpleaded facts as true, viewing them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.'" In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litig. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law Symposium Sorry, guys, I did not follow the patent panels.Panel III: Trademarks Rebecca Tushnet, Fixing Incontestability: The Next FrontierIncontestability is a nearly unique feature of American trademark law, with a unique American implementation. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm
In Illinois, for example, Ida B. [read post]
