Search for: "In Re Request for Instructions From Disc. Counsel" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2009, 12:35 pm by velvel
On the other hand, if such a desire played no role in the decision to use cash-in/cash-out, then the Trustee and SIPC have nothing to fear from the requested discovery. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:40 am by Jay Yurkiw
Thereafter, the court would determine the appropriate instruction to give to the jury and consider the plaintiffs’ request for attorneys’ fees and costs. [read post]
3 May 2013, 8:34 am by K&L Gates
”  Notably, the court instructed that to the extent costs are excessive, a party may seek a protective order (which Gallo did) and that “[w]hen, as here, a district court denies a protective order, the movant can appeal that decision” but “it cannot obtain the same relief from § 1920 which “impose[s] rigid controls on cost-shifting in the federal courts. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:53 am
However, files from the computer were downloaded onto discs prior to that reinstallation, which were produced to the plaintiff. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:53 am
However, files from the computer were downloaded onto discs prior to that reinstallation, which were produced to the plaintiff. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:53 am
However, files from the computer were downloaded onto discs prior to that reinstallation, which were produced to the plaintiff. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
In the text, Rule 26(a)(2)(B) provides for the mandatory disclosure of certain expert witness information, even without a request from the opposing party. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Hayes, No. 06-30429 On an appeal by the government following the resentencing of defendant to 210 months imprisonment from an original 360 months on a habeas corpus petition due to ineffective assistance of sentencing counsel, grant of habeas relief is vacated and the case remanded for an evidentiary hearing on the ineffective assistance of counsel claim where: 1) the government's appeal was timely; 2) defense counsel did not object to the career offender… [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Van Patten, No. 07-212 Grant of habeas relief from a conviction and sentence for first-degree reckless homicide is reversed where, contrary to the ruling below, no clearly established law contrary to the state court's conclusion justified collateral relief with regard to a claim that petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel due to his participation in a plea hearing by speaker phone. . [read post]
27 May 2015, 9:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This exemption has been requested for audiovisual material made available in all formats, including DVDs protected by CSS, Blu-ray discs protected by AACS, and TPM-protected online distribution services. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm by NFS Esq.
Each interview was audio-recorded and saved on a separate compact disc. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Cain, 14-10008, another fifth-time relist, asks a pair of questions about Brady and ineffective assistance of counsel. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Jonathan Band, Counsel to the Library Copyright Alliance. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
  CLAIMANT’S TRIAL MEMORANDUM PURSUANT TO RULE 60Q-6.116(7)       COMES NOW the Claimant, by and through his undersigned counsel, and files this, Claimant’s Trial Memorandum Pursuant to Rule 60Q-6.116(7): POSTURE OF THE CASE Final Hearing is scheduled for November 30, 2020. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
It would be ironic indeed if Apple’s one-sided disclaimer of liabilities was what the judge relied on to deny Apple’s request to intervene in the suit. *** Judge: Nash Bargaining Is No Solution for Patent Damages In Uniloc v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:36 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
CLAIMANT’S TRIAL MEMORANDUM PURSUANT TO RULE 60Q-6.116(7)       COMES NOW the Claimant, by and through his undersigned counsel, and files this, Claimant’s Trial Memorandum Pursuant to Rule 60Q-6.116(7): POSTURE OF CASE Final Hearing is scheduled for November 30, 2020. [read post]