Search for: "In Re SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. "
Results 1 - 20
of 113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2012, 8:39 am
’s (“Apple”) motion seeking permission to re-take the depositions of five witnesses of Complainants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 2:25 pm
. $290.45 million Thursday following a re-trial in the protracted legal struggle between the American technology giant and Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:49 am
James Gildea issued Order No. 56 granting Complainants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC’s (collectively, “Samsung”) motion to strike Respondent Apple Inc. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:07 pm
James Gildea issued Order No. 40 granting-in-part Complainants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC’s (collectively, “Samsung”) motion to strike Respondent Apple Inc. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 5:24 am
See, e.g., In re Detroit Athletic Co., 903 F.3d 1297, 1307 128 USPQ2d 1047, 1052 (Fed. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
Let’s have a look at the shareholding structure of those six factories: Shenzhen Samsung Kejian Mobile Telecommunication Technology Co., Ltd, with about 500 workers, is 60% owned by Samsung and primarily produces Samsung’s CDMA cell phones; Huizhou Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, with about 10,000 workers, is 99% owned by Samsung and primarily produces MP3/MP4 players, MINI combinedspeakers… [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:21 pm
The Respondents in this investigation are: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:36 pm
Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9 and Apple's RCD Assessing its jurisdiction, the Dutch court observed that the parties in the case before it (Samsung Electronics Co Ltd. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 2:52 am
Samsung Electronics Co., No. 11-CV-01846, 2012 WL 3283478 (N.D. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 7:30 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, 1-16-cv-21761 (FLSD June 12, 2018, Order) (Moore, USDJ) [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 7:03 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et. al., 2-12-cv-00548 (VAED January 8, 2014, Order) (Davis, J.) [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:28 am
by Dennis Crouch In re Samsung Electronics Co., LTD (Fed. [read post]
16 May 2012, 8:43 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 1662048 (Fed. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:23 am
June 5, 2019 - 1 PM: In re Telecom (China) Ltd., Serial No. 87440925 [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark DIRTY LAUNDRY for "Hooded sweatshirts; Jackets; Jeans; Pants; Shirts; Shorts; T-shirts," in view of the identical mark registered for "footwear" and for "luggage" by two different owners].June 12, 2019 - 1 PM: In re Lisa Brewer Buffaloe, Serial No. 87880862 [Refusal to register the mark JOHN 15:11 PUBLICATIONS on the grounds that the mark… [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 1:28 pm
The High Court found that such services, comprising the cut and scanning of books per client’s request, amount to copyright infringement.Moving to designs, Paul Tjiam and Hidde Koenraad recaps on MARQUES Class99 the decision issued by the District Court of the Hague in the consolidated cases Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Maxperian NL BV and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Digital Revolution BV [ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2016:14383, para… [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:57 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California denying Apple’s request for a permanent injunction against Sam- sung Electronics Company, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:59 am
(patent infringement) 12/2: In re: Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation (patent infringement) 12/2: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:40 pm
The complaint alleges that Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas (collectively, “Samsung”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, sell within the U.S. after importation, and/or offer for sale within the U.S. after importation certain electronic digital media… [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:07 pm
For example, Samsung might have agreed to let Apple enforce its damages claim, if necessary, against Samsung's U.S. operations, even the part of the damages claim that Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
