Search for: "In Re Sauers" Results 1 - 20 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2013, 9:09 pm by Old Fox
linkThe Sauer und Sohn 38H Pistolby Aaron ShulerWhen a Sauer 38H walked up to me at an Alaska gun show years ago, I was hardly an expert on the weapon. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 10:50 am by CorporateAcquisitions MergerLawBlogger
Thinking about it now, it turns out that the 2011 settlement approval of In re Sauer Danfoss Shareholder Litig is an important case. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:40 am by buslawblogger
The plaintiff shareholders of Sauer-Danfoss Inc. filed suit hours after Danfoss A/S, the Company's controlling stockholder, announced a plan to launch a tender offer for the Sauer-Danfoss minority shares. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by Trusts EstatesProf
In re Estate of Sauers, 32 A.3d 1241 (Pa. 2011), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the ERISA preemption provision (29 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Trusts EstatesProf
On August 21, 2009, I blogged about a Superior Court of Pennsylvania case entitled In re Estate of Sauers, 971 A.2d 1265 (Pa. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 8:04 pm by karplawfirm
If at any time one of these new owner can no longer care for the cat, he/she must bring it back to the shelter for re-homing. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 7:45 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Of examples:Applicant discusses other Sauer examples in what is essentially an attempt tolimit Sauer’s teachings to its examples. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 6:38 am
I can see his point: they're an accomplished group. [read post]
He also dismissed Sauer’s claims that allowing for such prosecutions would open a floodgate of litigation, stating: The fact that this investigation [yielded criminal charges] doesn’t reflect that we’re going to see a sea change of vindictive tit for tat prosecutions in the future. [read post]
13 May 2007, 9:11 pm
Says Hans Sauer, intellectual-property counsel for the Biotechnology Industry Organization in Washington: "We're not totally thrilled. [read post]
She summed up what she thought Sauer’s argument was when she stated, “A president is entitled to total personal gain to use the trappings of his office – that’s what you’re trying to get us to hold – without facing criminal liability. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
This Court previously has noted in In re Sauer-Danfoss, however, that a supplemental disclosure explicitly stating that the board and its advisers did not adjust its projections was immaterial and did not benefit stockholders. [read post]