Search for: "In Re Silicone Gel Breast Implants Products Liability Litigation" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 10:00 am by info@thomasjhenrylaw.com
Henry Injury Attorneys are leaders in the area of product liability litigation. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:35 am by Schachtman
Back in 2001, in the aftermath of the silicone gel breast implant litigation, I participated in a Federal Judicial Center (FJC) television production of “Science in the Courtroom, program 6” (2001). [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:30 pm by Schachtman
Absent from Professor Rabin’s historical discussion is any mention of the silicone gel breast implant litigation, which took hold with the advocacy of expert witnesses, described by Judge Jack Weinstein as “charlatans,” B. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:53 pm by Schachtman
The discussion of common-benefit funds could benefit from discussing some of the mechanics of ensuring that monies in the funds are returned to claimants at the conclusion of the litigation to avoid improprieties, such as have been seen in MDL 926, In re Silicone Gel Breast Implants Litigation. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am by Sean Wajert
Co., 888 F.2d 45 (6th Cir. 1989) (applying Michigan law); In Re: Silicone Gel Breast Implants Products, 996 F. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am by Schachtman
” The late Judge Sam Pointer, appointed to preside over MDL 926, In re Silicone Gel Breast Implants Products Liability Litigation, Master File No. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:22 am by David Bernstein
In the silicone gel breast implant litigation, one defense expert witness conducted and published his meta-analysis of autoimmune disease outcomes. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm by Schachtman
” Apparently, the APHA was not, and is not, concerned with the emboldening the  litigation industry and its efforts to subvert the truth-finding function of civil litigation. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:08 am by Schachtman
In the silicone gel breast implant litigation, one defense expert witness conducted and published his meta-analysis of autoimmune disease outcomes. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:59 pm by Schachtman
In re Silicone Gel Breast Implant Product Liability Litigation. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 10:11 am by admin
Rev. de novo 1, 14 (2009) (“[t]he breast implant litigation was largely based on a litigation fraud. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 10:11 am by Schachtman
Rev. de novo 1, 14 (2009) (“[t]he breast implant litigation was largely based on a litigation fraud. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:35 am
The court held that this kind of warning liabilty was too broad to be permitted:If I accept plaintiffs' argument, the law will be permitting recovery for a risk that the plaintiff assumed because the plaintiff might have made a different decision as a result of knowing of other risks for which the plaintiff did not experience any harm.In re Silicone Breast Implant Litigation, 64 D. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:50 am by Schachtman
In the silicone gel breast implant litigation, MDL 926, Judge Sam Pointer found himself in the “middle. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
The important divide between regulatory practice and the litigation of causal claims in civil actions arises from the theoretical nature of the risk assessment enterprise. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm by Schachtman
  They point to litigations, such as the Bendectin and silicone gel breast implant cases, where the defense challenges were supported in part by a body of “exonerative” epidemiologic studies. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 911 F.2d 941, 958-58 (3d Cir. 1990); In re Silicone Gel Breast Implants Products Liability Litigation, 318 F.Supp.2d 879, 893 (C.D. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:06 am by Schachtman
According to SKAPP’s website, the organization enjoyed past support from the Common Benefit Trust, a fund established pursuant to a court order in the Silicone Gel Breast Implant Products Liability litigation. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
August 16, 2001) (excluding causation opinion testimony given contrary epidemiologic studies; noting that sufficient epidemiologic evidence requires relative risk greater than two) In re Silicone Gel Breast Implant Litig., 318 F. [read post]