Search for: "In Re Slusher"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2015, 10:05 pm
The Court of Appeals panel ruled that Slusher had no expectation of employment for a significant period that could trigger his re-employment protection under USERRA when he returned from deployment. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:57 am
You're both wrong. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:30 am
Characterizing that outcome as letting him "walk free," as Slusher did, is disigenuous in the extreme. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:21 pm
See Footnote 13.), In re Wieland, 382 BR at 798-99, In re Slusher, 359 BR 290, 310 Bankr. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 10:01 pm
Terry Branstad, favored to win easy re-election for his sixth term, promises to keep “fighting for the state’s agricultural industry. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, September 02, 2008 Slusher v. [read post]
