Search for: "In Re Standard Power & Light Corporation"
Results 1 - 20
of 656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
In Re John Q Hammons Hotels Inc. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:58 am
Approximately 60 percent of U.S. transportation-related GHG emissions are caused by light-duty vehicles (LDVs), which chiefly consist of gasoline-powered passenger cars and light-duty trucks, including sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks, and minivans. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 9:29 am
CIAA’s anti-’traffic light’ labelling lobbying campaign, which at €1 billion was one of the most expensive ever to be set on the EU stage, serves as a reminder of the fearsome power that unelected business representatives can exert over democratic processes. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
” This caution is clearly warranted in light of the known risks of relying on commercial AI tools now in the hands of workers, including ChatGPT. [read post]
Rare Partnership Dissolution Decision Applies Deadlock Standard to Dissolution Under Partnership Law
22 Jan 2018, 3:44 am
Usually, the various dissolution statutes under the Business Corporation Law (BCL) or the Limited Liability Company Law (LLC Law) provide the standards to resolve the dispute. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
As required by the Delaware corporations law, the conversion was approved by the respective boards and a majority of outstanding voting power of both corporations. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
Consider the role of fiduciary duty and monitoring and due diligence obligations of enterprises in light of changing jurisprudence. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
At a minimum, this opinion demonstrates that corporations and downstream consumers are both of concern, at least in the "hold-up" context.Going forward, practitioners will be looking to the FTC to see the application of Section 5 in future cases, in light of the apparently broad new interpretation and the 3-2 decision split. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 7:50 am
It’s true that the bill won’t, itself, reduce corporate emissions. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:39 pm
In Re Trulia Inc. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 7:59 pm
In this light, questions—is it necessary or advisable to draft a treaty on corporations and human rights; what the content of that treaty and its implications could or should be; and related aspects—acquires more interesting dimension when considered in its process dimensions. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
But the trend is real, and we’re committed to dedicating the resources necessary to counter the threat. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
Res. 37 that would disapprove the Environmental Protection Agency's recently issued Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) for coal-fueled power plants (also known as Utility MACT). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
In In re El Paso Corp. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Consider the role of fiduciary duty and monitoring and due diligence obligations of enterprises in light of changing jurisprudence. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
The court explained that the standard of review for the scope of relief is abuse of discretion, but de novo review applies to questions of law such as whether the stated purpose under Section 220 is proper. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
It is a story of corporate maneuvering and high-stakes litigation, as Thomas Edison and [p. 1894] his competitors employed patents as weapons in their battle to dominate the electrical industry. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 10:54 pm
The political context is globalization and its re-situating of the state (or perhaps at this moment in time all but the most powerful of them) as perhaps not the sole occupant of the apex of political and social power in the world. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:32 pm
Standard Forex (E.D.N.Y. 1995), and to waive attorney-client and work product protection over the objection of a former corporation officer facing criminal charges, United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 5:22 am
Before I get too much further, though, let me give you the standard disclaimer that the views I express here today are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Securities and Exchange Commission or my fellow Commissioners [read post]
